Stathakis Sotirios, Esquivel Carlos, Gutiérrez Alonso N, Shi ChengYu, Papanikolaou Niko
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Appl Radiat Isot. 2009 Oct;67(10):1939-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.06.012. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
In this paper, we present an alternative to the originally proposed technique for the delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) using multi-leaf collimator (MLC) shaped fields. We employ the MLC to deliver various pattern GRID treatments to large solid tumors and dosimetrically characterize the GRID fields.
The GRID fields were created with different open to blocked area ratios and with variable separation between the openings using a MLC. GRID designs were introduced into the Pinnacle(3) treatment planning system, and the dose was calculated in a water phantom. Ionization chamber and film measurements using both Kodak EDR2 and Gafchromic EBT film were performed in a SolidWater phantom to determine the relative output of each GRID design as well as its spatial dosimetric characteristics.
Agreement within 5.0% was observed between the Pinnacle(3) predicted dose distributions and the measurements for the majority of experiments performed. A higher magnitude of discrepancy (15%) was observed using a high photon beam energy (18MV) and small GRID opening. Skin dose at the GRID openings was higher than the corresponding open field by a factor as high as three for both photon energies and was found to be independent of the open-to-blocked area ratio.
In summary, we reaffirm that the MLC can be used to deliver spatially fractionated GRID therapy and show that various GRID patterns may be generated. The Pinnacle(3) TPS can accurately calculate the dose of the different GRID patterns in our study to within 5% for the majority of the cases based on film and ion chamber measurements. Disadvantages of MLC-based GRID therapy are longer treatment times and higher surface doses.
在本文中,我们提出了一种替代最初提出的使用多叶准直器(MLC)成形射野进行立体定向分割放射治疗(GRID)的技术。我们使用MLC对大型实体瘤进行各种模式的GRID治疗,并对GRID射野进行剂量学特征分析。
使用MLC创建具有不同开放与遮挡面积比以及不同开口间距的GRID射野。将GRID设计引入Pinnacle(3)治疗计划系统,并在水模体中计算剂量。在固体水模体中使用柯达EDR2和Gafchromic EBT胶片进行电离室和胶片测量,以确定每种GRID设计的相对输出及其空间剂量学特征。
在大多数实验中,观察到Pinnacle(3)预测的剂量分布与测量结果之间的一致性在5.0%以内。在使用高光子束能量(18MV)和小GRID开口时,观察到更高的差异幅度(15%)。对于两种光子能量,GRID开口处的皮肤剂量比相应的开放射野高出高达三倍,并且发现其与开放与遮挡面积比无关。
总之,我们重申MLC可用于实施立体定向分割GRID治疗,并表明可以生成各种GRID模式。基于胶片和电离室测量,Pinnacle(3)治疗计划系统在我们的研究中能够在大多数情况下将不同GRID模式的剂量准确计算在5%以内。基于MLC的GRID治疗的缺点是治疗时间更长和表面剂量更高。