Ozkan Kerem, Braunstein Myron L
University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1305-12. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1305.
The superiority of ground surfaces over ceiling surfaces in determining the representation of the visual world, demonstrated in several studies of visual perception and visual search, has been attributed to a preference for top-away projections resulting from ecological constraints. Recent research on binocular rivalry indicates that ecological constraints affect predominance relations. The present study considered whether there is a difference in predominance between ground and ceiling surfaces. In Experiment 1, we examined whether a ground surface would dominate a ceiling surface when one surface was presented to each eye. In Experiment 2, we used an eye-swapping paradigm to determine whether a ground surface would come to dominance faster than a ceiling surface when presented to the suppressed eye. The eye-swapping paradigm was used again in Experiment 3, but the ground and ceiling planes were replaced with frontal planes with similar variations in texture density. The results of these experiments indicate that ground surfaces are predominant over ceiling surfaces, with this predominance affecting both the dominance and suppression phases of binocular rivalry. This superiority of ground planes is independent of image properties such as the increase or decrease in texture density from the lower half to the upper half of the images.
在多项视觉感知和视觉搜索研究中所证明的,地面表面在确定视觉世界表征方面相对于天花板表面的优越性,被归因于生态限制导致的对从上向下投影的偏好。最近关于双眼竞争的研究表明,生态限制会影响优势关系。本研究探讨了地面和天花板表面在优势方面是否存在差异。在实验1中,我们检查了当分别向每只眼睛呈现一个表面时,地面表面是否会比天花板表面占优势。在实验2中,我们使用了眼睛切换范式来确定当呈现给被抑制的眼睛时,地面表面是否会比天花板表面更快地占据优势。实验3再次使用了眼睛切换范式,但地面和天花板平面被具有相似纹理密度变化的 frontal planes 所取代。这些实验的结果表明,地面表面比天花板表面更具优势,这种优势影响了双眼竞争的优势和抑制阶段。地面平面的这种优越性与图像属性无关,例如图像从下半部分到上半部分纹理密度的增加或减少。 (注:原文中frontal planes 可能有误,推测可能是frontal planes,但此处无法准确判断其具体含义,所以保留原文未翻译。)