• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于解读生命体征的算法工具。

Algorithmic tools for interpreting vital signs.

作者信息

Rathbun Melina C, Ruth-Sahd Lisa A

机构信息

Diabetes and Endocrinology Institute, University Community Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 2009 Jul;48(7):395-400. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090615-07.

DOI:10.3928/01484834-20090615-07
PMID:19634265
Abstract

Today's complex world of nursing practice challenges nurse educators to develop teaching methods that promote critical thinking skills and foster quick problem solving in the novice nurse. Traditional pedagogies previously used in the classroom and clinical setting are no longer adequate to prepare nursing students for entry into practice. In addition, educators have expressed frustration when encouraging students to apply newly learned theoretical content to direct the care of assigned patients in the clinical setting. This article presents algorithms as an innovative teaching strategy to guide novice student nurses in the interpretation and decision making related to vital sign assessment in an acute care setting.

摘要

当今复杂的护理实践环境对护理教育工作者提出了挑战,要求他们开发能够培养批判性思维技能并促进新手护士快速解决问题的教学方法。以前在课堂和临床环境中使用的传统教学方法已不足以让护理专业学生为进入实践做好准备。此外,教育工作者在鼓励学生将新学到的理论知识应用于指导临床环境中指定患者的护理时,也表达了挫败感。本文介绍了算法作为一种创新的教学策略,以指导新手护生在急性护理环境中进行生命体征评估时的解读和决策。

相似文献

1
Algorithmic tools for interpreting vital signs.用于解读生命体征的算法工具。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Jul;48(7):395-400. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090615-07.
2
Reliability of assessment of critical thinking.批判性思维评估的可靠性。
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.004.
3
"Covering content" and teaching thinking: deconstructing the additive curriculum.“覆盖内容”与教学思维:解构附加课程
J Nurs Educ. 2004 Jan;43(1):5-12. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20040101-02.
4
Critical thinking of student nurses during clinical accompaniment.实习护士在临床陪伴期间的批判性思维。
Curationis. 2005 Aug;28(3):11-9. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v28i3.964.
5
Decision making by baccalaureate nursing students in the clinical setting.护理学学士学生在临床环境中的决策制定。
J Nurs Educ. 2008 Aug;47(8):345-50. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080801-02.
6
Friday night in the pediatric emergency department: a simulated exercise to promote clinical reasoning in the classroom.儿科急诊科的周五夜晚:一场在课堂上促进临床推理的模拟演练。
Nurse Educ. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):24-9. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200701000-00008.
7
Concept mapping: an effective, active teaching-learning method.概念图:一种有效的主动式教学方法。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006 Jul-Aug;27(4):197-203.
8
Strategies to overcome obstacles in the facilitation of critical thinking in nursing education.在护理教育中促进批判性思维时克服障碍的策略。
Nurse Educ Today. 2005 May;25(4):291-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.012. Epub 2005 Apr 12.
9
Using a conceptual approach with concept mapping to promote critical thinking.采用概念映射的概念方法来促进批判性思维。
J Nurs Educ. 2009 Jan;48(1):45-8. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090101-11.
10
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.