Suppr超能文献

新型半月板修复策略的潜在市场:MOON队列研究评估

Potential market for new meniscus repair strategies: evaluation of the MOON cohort.

作者信息

Fetzer Gary B, Spindler Kurt P, Amendola Annunziato, Andrish Jack T, Bergfeld John A, Dunn Warren R, Flanigan David C, Jones Morgan, Kaeding Christopher C, Marx Robert G, Matava Matthew J, McCarty Eric C, Parker Richard D, Wolcott Michelle, Vidal Armando, Wolf Brian R, Wright Rick W

机构信息

TRIA Orthopaedic Center, Minneapolis, Minn, USA.

出版信息

J Knee Surg. 2009 Jul;22(3):180-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247746.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the incidence of meniscal tears and describe the tear morphology and selected treatment in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We also will discuss the potential market for future tissue engineering aimed at preserving meniscal function. A multicenter cohort of 1014 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction between January 2002 and December 2003 was evaluated. Data on patient demographics, presence of a meniscus tear at time of ACL reconstruction, tear morphology, and meniscal treatment were collected prospectively. Meniscal tears were categorized into 3 potential tissue engineering treatment strategies: all-biologic repair, advanced repair, and scaffold replacement. Of the knees, 36% had medial meniscal tears and 44% had lateral meniscal tears. Longitudinal tears were the most common tear morphology. The most frequent treatment method was partial meniscectomy. Thirty percent of medial meniscal tears and 10% of lateral meniscal tears are eligible for all-biologic repair; 35% of medial meniscal tears and 35% of lateral meniscal tears are eligible for an advanced repair technique; and 35% of medial meniscal tears and 55% of lateral meniscal tears are eligible for scaffold replacement. Although meniscal preservation is generally accepted in the treatment of meniscal tears, most tears in this cohort were not repairable, despite contemporary methods. The results of this cohort will hopefully stimulate and focus future research and development of new tissue engineering strategies for meniscus repair.

摘要

本研究旨在确定半月板撕裂的发生率,并描述前交叉韧带(ACL)重建患者的撕裂形态及所选治疗方法。我们还将讨论未来旨在保留半月板功能的组织工程的潜在市场。对2002年1月至2003年12月期间接受ACL重建的1014例患者的多中心队列进行了评估。前瞻性收集了患者人口统计学数据、ACL重建时半月板撕裂的情况、撕裂形态及半月板治疗情况。半月板撕裂分为3种潜在的组织工程治疗策略:全生物修复、高级修复和支架置换。在这些膝关节中,36%有内侧半月板撕裂,44%有外侧半月板撕裂。纵向撕裂是最常见的撕裂形态。最常用的治疗方法是半月板部分切除术。30%的内侧半月板撕裂和10%的外侧半月板撕裂适合全生物修复;35%的内侧半月板撕裂和35%的外侧半月板撕裂适合高级修复技术;35%的内侧半月板撕裂和55%的外侧半月板撕裂适合支架置换。尽管在半月板撕裂的治疗中半月板保留一般被认可,但尽管有现代方法,该队列中的大多数撕裂仍无法修复。该队列的结果有望激发并聚焦于未来半月板修复新组织工程策略的研究与开发。

相似文献

4
Meniscal tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament injury.与前交叉韧带损伤相关的半月板撕裂
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Dec;135(12):1701-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2309-4. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
6
Incidence and type of meniscal tears in multilligament injured knees.多韧带损伤膝关节半月板撕裂的发生率和类型。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Feb;31(2):465-474. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07064-6. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Amount of meniscal resection after failed meniscal repair.半月板修复失败后的半月板切除量。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Aug;39(8):1648-52. doi: 10.1177/0363546511402661. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

8
Pneumatospinning Biomimetic Scaffolds for Meniscus Tissue Engineering.用于半月板组织工程的气动纺丝仿生支架
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 2;10:810705. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.810705. eCollection 2022.
9
Contemporary Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in the United States.美国前交叉韧带撕裂治疗的当代实践模式
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):23259671211040891. doi: 10.1177/23259671211040891. eCollection 2021 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Arthroscopic meniscal repair.关节镜下半月板修复术。
Orthopedics. 1983 Sep 1;6(9):1125-9. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19830901-07.
5
Multirater agreement of arthroscopic meniscal lesions.关节镜下半月板损伤的多评估者一致性
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Dec;32(8):1937-40. doi: 10.1177/0363546504264586.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验