Donker Tara, van Straten Annemieke, Riper Heleen, Marks Isaac, Andersson Gerhard, Cuijpers Pim
Department of Clinical Psychology, VU University, van der Boechorstraat 1, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Trials. 2009 Jul 27;10:59. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-10-59.
Internet-based self-help is an effective preventive intervention for highly prevalent disorders, such as depression and anxiety. It is not clear, however, whether it is necessary to offer these interventions with professional support or if they work without any guidance. In case support is necessary, it is not clear which level of support is needed. This study examines whether an internet-based self-help intervention with a coach is more effective than the same intervention without a coach in terms of clinical outcomes, drop-out and economic costs. Moreover, we will investigate which level of support by a coach is more effective compared to other levels of support.
In this randomized controlled trial, a total of 500 subjects (18 year and older) from the general population with mild to moderate depression and/or anxiety will be assigned to one of five conditions: (1) web-based problem solving through the internet (self-examination therapy) without a coach; (2) the same as 1, but with the possibility to ask help from a coach on the initiative of the respondent (on demand, by email); (3) the same as 1, but with weekly scheduled contacts initiated by a coach (once per week, by email); (4) weekly scheduled contacts initiated by a coach, but no web-based intervention; (5) information only (through the internet). The interventions will consist of five weekly lessons. Primary outcome measures are symptoms of depression and anxiety. Secondary outcome measures are drop-out from the intervention, quality of life, and economic costs. Other secondary outcome measures that may predict outcome are also studied, e.g. client satisfaction and problem-solving skills. Measures are taken at baseline (pre-test), directly after the intervention (post-test, five weeks after baseline), 3 months later, and 12 months later. Analysis will be conducted on the intention-to-treat sample.
This study aims to provide more insight into the clinical effectiveness, differences in drop-out rate and costs between interventions with and without support, and in particular different levels of support. This is important to know in relation to the dissemination of internet-based self-help interventions.
Nederlands Trial Register (NTR): TC1355.
基于互联网的自助是针对抑郁症和焦虑症等高度流行疾病的一种有效预防干预措施。然而,尚不清楚提供这些干预措施时是否需要专业支持,或者它们在没有任何指导的情况下是否有效。如果需要支持,也不清楚需要何种程度的支持。本研究考察了在临床疗效、退出率和经济成本方面,有指导教练的基于互联网的自助干预是否比没有教练的相同干预更有效。此外,我们将研究与其他支持水平相比,教练提供何种程度的支持更有效。
在这项随机对照试验中,共有500名年龄在18岁及以上、患有轻度至中度抑郁症和/或焦虑症的普通人群受试者将被分配到以下五种情况之一:(1)通过互联网进行基于网络的问题解决(自我检查疗法),无教练指导;(2)与(1)相同,但被试者可主动向教练寻求帮助(按需,通过电子邮件);(3)与(1)相同,但由教练发起每周定期联系(每周一次,通过电子邮件);(4)由教练发起每周定期联系,但无基于网络的干预;(5)仅提供信息(通过互联网)。干预措施将包括每周一次的五节课。主要结局指标为抑郁和焦虑症状。次要结局指标为干预退出率、生活质量和经济成本。还研究了其他可能预测结局的次要结局指标,如客户满意度和解决问题的能力。在基线(预测试)、干预结束后立即(后测试,基线后五周)、3个月后和12个月后进行测量。将对意向性治疗样本进行分析。
本研究旨在更深入了解临床疗效、有无支持的干预措施在退出率和成本方面的差异,特别是不同水平的支持。这对于了解基于互联网的自助干预措施的传播很重要。
荷兰试验注册库(NTR):TC1355 。