Suppr超能文献

基于网络的抑郁症门诊患者自助引导干预的有效性:一项随机对照试验的短期结果

Effectiveness of a Web-Based Guided Self-help Intervention for Outpatients With a Depressive Disorder: Short-term Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kenter Robin Maria Francisca, Cuijpers Pim, Beekman Aartjan, van Straten Annemieke

机构信息

Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 31;18(3):e80. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4861.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research has convincingly demonstrated that symptoms of depression can be reduced through guided Internet-based interventions. However, most of those studies recruited people form the general population. There is insufficient evidence for the effectiveness when delivered in routine clinical practice in outpatient clinics.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to study patients with a depressive disorder (as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Disorders, fourth edition), as assessed by trained interviewers with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, who registered for treatment at an outpatient mental health clinic. We aimed to examine the effectiveness of guided Internet-based self-help before starting face-to-face treatment.

METHODS

We recruited 269 outpatients, aged between 18 and 79 years, from outpatient clinics and randomly allocated them to Internet-based problem solving therapy (n=136), with weekly student support, or to a control condition, who remained on the waitlist with a self-help booklet (control group; n=133). Participants in both conditions were allowed to take up face-to-face treatment at the outpatient clinics afterward. We measured the primary outcome, depressive symptoms, by Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D). Secondary outcome measures were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A), Insomnia Severity Index questionnaire (ISI), and EuroQol visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). All outcomes were assessed by telephone at posttest (8 weeks after baseline).

RESULTS

Posttest measures were completed by 184 (68.4%) participants. We found a moderate to large within-group effect size for both the intervention (d=0.75) and the control (d=0.69) group. However, the between-group effect size was very small (d=0.07), and regression analysis on posttreatment CES-D scores revealed no significant differences between the groups (b=1.134, 95% CI -2.495 to 4.763). The per-protocol analysis (≥4 sessions completed) results were also not significant (b=1.154, 95% CI -1.978 to 7.637). Between-group differences were small and not significant for all secondary outcomes. Adherence to the intervention was low. Only 36% (49/136) received an adequate dosage of the intervention (≥4 of 5 sessions). The overall treatment satisfaction was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Internet-based problem solving therapy is not more effective in reducing symptoms of depression than receiving an unguided self-help book during the waitlist period at outpatient mental health clinics. The effect sizes are much smaller than those found in earlier research in the general population, and the low rates of adherence indicate that the acceptability of the intervention at this stage of treatment for depressed outpatients is low. However, taking into account that there is much evidence for the efficacy of Internet-based treatments, it is too early to draw firm conclusions about the effectiveness of these treatments in outpatient clinics as a whole.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register NTR2824; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2824 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation/ 6g3WEuiqH).

摘要

背景

研究已令人信服地证明,通过有指导的基于互联网的干预措施可以减轻抑郁症状。然而,这些研究大多招募的是普通人群。在门诊诊所的常规临床实践中实施时,其有效性的证据不足。

目的

这项随机对照试验的目的是研究由训练有素的访谈员使用综合国际诊断访谈评估为患有抑郁症(根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版定义)、并在门诊心理健康诊所登记接受治疗的患者。我们旨在研究在开始面对面治疗之前有指导的基于互联网的自助的有效性。

方法

我们从门诊诊所招募了269名年龄在18至79岁之间的门诊患者,并将他们随机分配到基于互联网的问题解决疗法组(n = 136),每周有学生提供支持,或分配到对照组,对照组拿着一本自助手册留在等候名单上(对照组;n = 133)。之后,两组参与者都可以在门诊诊所接受面对面治疗。我们通过流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)测量主要结局,即抑郁症状。次要结局指标包括医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表(HADS-A)、失眠严重程度指数问卷(ISI)和欧洲五维度健康量表视觉模拟量表(EQ-5D VAS)。所有结局均在测试后(基线后8周)通过电话进行评估。

结果

184名(68.4%)参与者完成了测试后测量。我们发现干预组(d = 0.75)和对照组(d = 0.69)的组内效应量均为中等至较大。然而,组间效应量非常小(d = 0.07),对治疗后CES-D评分的回归分析显示两组之间无显著差异(b = 1.134,95% CI -(此处原文有误,推测应为95%CI -2.495 to 4.763))。符合方案分析(完成≥4次疗程)结果也不显著(b = 1.154,95% CI -1.978 to 7.637)。所有次要结局的组间差异均较小且不显著。干预的依从性较低。只有36%(49/136)的人接受了足够剂量的干预(5次疗程中≥4次)。总体治疗满意度为中等。

结论

在门诊心理健康诊所的等候期间,基于互联网的问题解决疗法在减轻抑郁症状方面并不比接受一本无指导的自助手册更有效。效应量远小于早期在普通人群中进行的研究中发现的效应量,低依从率表明该干预措施在抑郁症门诊患者治疗的这个阶段的可接受性较低。然而,考虑到有大量证据证明基于互联网的治疗方法的疗效,就这些治疗方法在整个门诊诊所的有效性得出确凿结论还为时过早。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册库NTR2824;http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2824(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation/ 6g3WEuiqH)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d7f/4832120/bf591c8ed6ea/jmir_v18i3e80_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验