Suppr超能文献

《尿动力学评估价值(ValUE)试验设计:术前尿动力学研究的非劣效性随机试验》

Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations.

机构信息

Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Urodynamic studies (UDS) are routinely obtained prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) despite a lack of evidence that UDS information has an actual impact on outcome. The primary aim of this non-inferiority randomized clinical trial is to determine whether women with symptomatic, uncomplicated SUI who undergo only a basic office evaluation (BOE) prior to SUI surgery (No UDS arm) have non-inferior treatment outcomes compared to women who have BOE and UDS (UDS arm). Secondary aims are: 1) to determine how often physicians use preoperative UDS results to alter clinical and surgical decision-making, 2) to compare the amount of improvement in incontinence outcomes, and 3) to determine the incremental cost and utility of performing UDS compared with not performing UDS.

METHODS

After an initial basic office evaluation, women planning surgery for uncomplicated SUI who consent to study participation will be randomized to receive preoperative UDS or No UDS. Treatment will be planned and performed by the surgeon utilizing all the data available to them. We will compare results from the basic office evaluation (No UDS) with results from the basic office evaluation and preoperative UDS.

RESULTS

The primary outcome will be measured at 12 months using responses to the Urogenital Distress Inventory and the Patient Global Index-Improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Randomized trials comparing the effects of different diagnostic alternatives on treatment outcomes pose study design challenges. A non-inferiority design is appropriate when comparing a less invasive and less expensive alternative with a standard of care approach.

摘要

背景与目的

尽管尿动力学研究(UDS)信息对治疗结果并无实际影响,但仍常规用于压力性尿失禁(SUI)手术前。本非劣效性随机临床试验的主要目的是确定仅在 SUI 手术前进行基本办公室评估(无 UDS 组)的有症状、单纯性 SUI 女性与进行基本办公室评估和 UDS(UDS 组)的女性相比,其治疗结果是否无差异。次要目的是:1)确定医生在多大程度上使用术前 UDS 结果来改变临床和手术决策,2)比较尿失禁结果改善的程度,3)确定与不进行 UDS 相比,进行 UDS 的增量成本和效用。

方法

在进行初始基本办公室评估后,计划接受单纯性 SUI 手术且同意参与研究的女性将被随机分配接受术前 UDS 或无 UDS。治疗将由外科医生根据他们可获得的所有数据进行计划和实施。我们将比较基本办公室评估(无 UDS)和基本办公室评估及术前 UDS 的结果。

结果

主要结局将在 12 个月时通过尿生殖窘迫量表和患者整体改善量表的回答进行评估。

结论

比较不同诊断方法对治疗结果影响的随机试验存在研究设计挑战。当比较一种侵入性和费用较低的替代方法与标准治疗方法时,非劣效性设计是合适的。

相似文献

1
Design of the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial: A non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Nov;30(6):531-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
2
The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):81-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.22684. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
5
The negative predictive value of preoperative urodynamics for stress urinary incontinence following prolapse surgery.
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Jul;30(7):1119-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-03864-y. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
6
European Urogynaecological Association Position Statement: The role of urodynamics in stress urinary incontinence evaluation and treatment decision.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Jun;297:176-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.024. Epub 2024 Apr 21.
7
Utilization of preoperative urodynamic studies by Canadian gynaecologists.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002 Apr;24(4):315-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30624-7.
9
Trends in urodynamic testing prior to midurethral sling placement-What was the value of the VALUE trial?
Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Mar;37(3):1046-1052. doi: 10.1002/nau.23398. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Trends in urodynamics study utilization in a Southern California managed care population.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):724.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.062. Epub 2015 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

3
Trial Design for Mixed Urinary Incontinence: Midurethral Sling Versus Botulinum Toxin A.
Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 May 1;30(5):478-488. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001422. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Factors associated with polyacrylamide hydrogel outcomes in women with stress urinary incontinence.
BJUI Compass. 2023 Jan 25;4(3):269-276. doi: 10.1002/bco2.218. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Evaluation of the urinary microbiota of women with uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;216(1):55.e1-55.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.049. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
7
Predicting urinary incontinence after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;28(5):399-406. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000308.
8
Methods for a multicenter randomized trial for mixed urinary incontinence: rationale and patient-centeredness of the ESTEEM trial.
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1479-90. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3031-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
9
Urodynamic studies for management of urinary incontinence in children and adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 29;2013(10):CD003195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003195.pub3.
10
Surgical preparation: are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery?
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Jan;25(1):41-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

本文引用的文献

3
Prevalence and co-occurrence of pelvic floor disorders in community-dwelling women.
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):678-85. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181660c1b.
5
Urinary incontinence in women: Direct costs of routine care.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):596.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.029. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
6
Reference urodynamic values for stress incontinent women.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26(3):333-40. doi: 10.1002/nau.20348.
7
Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies.
Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):63-7; discussion 67-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1118.
8
The "costs" of urinary incontinence for women.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;107(4):908-16. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000206213.48334.09.
9
Pragmatic clinical trials.
Complement Ther Med. 2004 Jun-Sep;12(2-3):136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.07.043.
10
Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jul;189(1):98-101. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.379.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验