Norton Peggy A, Nager Charles W, Brubaker Linda, Lemack Gary E, Sirls Larry T, Holley Robert, Chai Toby C, Kraus Stephen R, Zyczynski Halina, Smith Bridget, Stoddard Anne
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
University of California, San Diego, California.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):81-4. doi: 10.1002/nau.22684. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
Urodynamic studies (UDS) are generally recommended prior to surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), despite insufficient evidence that it impacts treatment plans or outcomes in patients with uncomplicated SUI. This analysis aimed to calculate the cost incurred when UDS was performed as a supplement to a basic office evaluation and to extrapolate the potential savings of not doing UDS in this patient population on a national basis.
This is a secondary analysis from the Value of Urodynamic Evaluation (ValUE) trial, a multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial to determine whether a basic office evaluation (OE) is non-inferior in terms of SUI surgery outcomes to office evaluation with addition of urodynamic studies (UDS). All participants underwent an OE; those patients who randomized to supplementary UDS underwent non-instrumented uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and a pressure flow study. Costs associated with UDS were calculated using 2014 U.S. Medicare allowable fees. Models using various patient populations and payor mixes were created to obtain a range of potential costs of performing UDS in patients undergoing SUI surgery annually in the United States.
Six hundred thirty women were randomized to OE or OE plus UDS. There was no difference in surgical outcomes between the two groups. The per patient cost of UDS varied from site to site, and included complex cystometrogram $314-$343 (CPT codes 51728-51729) plus complex uroflowmetry $16 (CPT code 51741). Extrapolating these costs for US women similar to our study population, 13-33 million US dollars could be saved annually by not performing preoperative urodynamics.
For women with uncomplicated SUI and a confirmatory preoperative basic office evaluation, tens of millions of dollars US could be saved annually by not performing urodynamic testing. In the management of such women, eliminating this preoperative test has a major economic benefit.
尽管没有充分证据表明尿动力学检查(UDS)会影响单纯性压力性尿失禁(SUI)患者的治疗方案或治疗结果,但一般仍建议在对SUI进行手术治疗前进行UDS检查。本分析旨在计算将UDS作为基本门诊评估补充手段时所产生的费用,并推断在全国范围内不对该患者群体进行UDS检查可能节省的费用。
这是对尿动力学评估价值(ValUE)试验的二次分析,该试验是一项多中心非劣效性随机试验,旨在确定基本门诊评估(OE)在SUI手术结果方面是否不劣于门诊评估加尿动力学检查(UDS)。所有参与者均接受了OE;那些随机接受补充UDS检查的患者进行了非仪器化尿流率测定、充盈性膀胱测压和压力流率研究。使用2014年美国医疗保险允许费用计算与UDS相关的费用。创建了使用各种患者群体和支付方组合的模型,以获得美国每年接受SUI手术患者进行UDS检查的一系列潜在费用。
630名女性被随机分为接受OE组或OE加UDS组。两组的手术结果没有差异。UDS的人均费用因地点而异,包括复杂膀胱测压图314 - 343美元(CPT编码51728 - 51729)加复杂尿流率测定16美元(CPT编码51741)。将这些费用推算到与我们研究人群相似的美国女性身上,不进行术前尿动力学检查每年可节省1300万至3300万美元。
对于患有单纯性SUI且术前基本门诊评估得到确认的女性,不进行尿动力学检查每年可节省数千万美元。在这类女性的管理中,取消这项术前检查具有重大的经济效益。