Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Center for Research in Human Development, Québec, Canada.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010 Feb;53(1):18-33. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0140). Epub 2009 Jul 27.
Using a dual-task paradigm, 2 experiments (Experiments 1 and 2) were conducted to assess differences in the amount of listening effort expended to understand speech in noise in audiovisual (AV) and audio-only (A-only) modalities. Experiment 1 had equivalent noise levels in both modalities, and Experiment 2 equated speech recognition performance levels by increasing the noise in the AV versus A-only modality.
Sixty adults were randomly assigned to Experiment 1 or Experiment 2. Participants performed speech and tactile recognition tasks separately (single task) and concurrently (dual task). The speech tasks were performed in both modalities. Accuracy and reaction time data were collected as well as ratings of perceived accuracy and effort.
In Experiment 1, the AV modality speech recognition was rated as less effortful, and accuracy scores were higher than A only. In Experiment 2, reaction times were slower, tactile task performance was poorer, and listening effort increased, in the AV versus the A-only modality.
At equivalent noise levels, speech recognition performance was enhanced and subjectively less effortful in the AV than A-only modality. At equivalent accuracy levels, the dual-task performance decrements (for both tasks) suggest that the noisier AV modality was more effortful than the A-only modality.
通过双任务范式,进行了两项实验(实验 1 和实验 2),以评估在视听(AV)和仅音频(A-only)模式下理解噪声中言语时所花费的听力努力量的差异。实验 1 中两种模式的噪声水平相等,实验 2 通过增加 AV 与 A-only 模式中的噪声来使语音识别性能水平相等。
60 名成年人被随机分配到实验 1 或实验 2。参与者分别(单任务)和同时(双任务)执行语音和触觉识别任务。这些语音任务在两种模式下进行。收集了准确性和反应时间数据以及感知准确性和努力程度的评分。
在实验 1 中,AV 模式的语音识别被评为费力较小,且准确性评分高于 A-only。在实验 2 中,与 A-only 模式相比,在 AV 中反应时间较慢,触觉任务表现较差,听力努力增加。
在等效噪声水平下,AV 模式的语音识别性能得到增强,且主观上比 A-only 模式费力较小。在等效准确性水平下,双任务表现下降(对于两个任务)表明更嘈杂的 AV 模式比 A-only 模式更费力。