• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

听觉、词汇和多任务需求交互影响听力努力程度。

Auditory, Lexical, and Multitasking Demands Interactively Impact Listening Effort.

机构信息

Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.

Applied Research Laboratory for Intelligence and Security, University of Maryland, College Park.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Oct 4;66(10):4066-4082. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00548. Epub 2023 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00548
PMID:37672797
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10713022/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study examined the extent to which acoustic, linguistic, and cognitive task demands interactively impact listening effort.

METHOD

Using a dual-task paradigm, on each trial, participants were instructed to perform either a single task or two tasks. In the primary word recognition task, participants repeated Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 words presented in speech-shaped noise at either an easier or a harder signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The words varied in how commonly they occur in the English language (lexical frequency). In the secondary visual task, participants were instructed to press a specific key as soon as a number appeared on screen (simpler task) or one of two keys to indicate whether the visualized number was even or odd (more complex task).

RESULTS

Manipulation checks revealed that key assumptions of the dual-task design were met. A significant three-way interaction was observed, such that the expected effect of SNR on effort was only observable for words with lower lexical frequency and only when multitasking demands were relatively simpler.

CONCLUSIONS

This work reveals that variability across speech stimuli can influence the sensitivity of the dual-task paradigm for detecting changes in listening effort. In line with previous work, the results of this study also suggest that higher cognitive demands may limit the ability to detect expected effects of SNR on measures of effort. With implications for real-world listening, these findings highlight that even relatively minor changes in lexical and multitasking demands can alter the effort devoted to listening in noise.

摘要

目的

本研究考察了声学、语言学和认知任务需求的相互作用对听力努力程度的影响程度。

方法

使用双任务范式,在每个试验中,指示参与者执行单一任务或两项任务。在主要的单词识别任务中,参与者重复以语音形状噪声呈现的西北大学听觉测试 6 单词,信号噪声比(SNR)要么更容易,要么更难。这些单词在英语中的出现频率(词汇频率)不同。在次要的视觉任务中,参与者被指示一旦屏幕上出现数字,就按下特定的键(更简单的任务),或者按下两个键之一,以指示可视化的数字是偶数还是奇数(更复杂的任务)。

结果

操作检查显示,双任务设计的关键假设得到满足。观察到显著的三向交互作用,即 SNR 对努力的预期影响仅在词汇频率较低的单词中观察到,并且只有在多重任务需求相对较简单时才观察到。

结论

这项工作表明,语音刺激的变化会影响双任务范式检测听力努力变化的敏感性。与之前的工作一致,本研究的结果还表明,更高的认知需求可能会限制检测 SNR 对努力度测量的预期影响的能力。这些发现对现实世界的听力具有影响,它们表明,词汇和多重任务需求的相对较小变化都可以改变在噪声中投入的听力努力程度。

相似文献

1
Auditory, Lexical, and Multitasking Demands Interactively Impact Listening Effort.听觉、词汇和多任务需求交互影响听力努力程度。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Oct 4;66(10):4066-4082. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00548. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
2
The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.在测量听力努力的双任务范式中改变次要任务的效果。
Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):611-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
3
Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.老年人使用非线性频率压缩助听器的噪声言语感知和聆听努力。
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):215-225. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000481.
4
How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.助听设备、背景噪声和视觉线索如何影响客观听力努力程度。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):e52-64. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431.
5
The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.正常听力或使用助听器的老年人群中,内在和外在认知需求对听觉功能的影响的成本。
Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):615-628. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000963.
6
Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.学龄期儿童听力努力行为测量:信号噪声比、听力损失和放大的影响研究
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):381-392. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000623.
7
Negative Effect of Acoustic Panels on Listening Effort in a Classroom Environment.吸音板对课堂环境中聆听努力的负面影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Nov/Dec;27(10):805-815. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15096.
8
Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children.学龄儿童通过加工深度进行听力努力。
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):568-576. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000436.
9
Listening Effort Measured Using a Dual-task Paradigm in Adults With Different Amounts of Noise Exposure.使用双任务范式对不同噪声暴露量的成年人进行听力努力测量。
Ear Hear. 2022 May/Jun;43(3):899-912. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001138.
10
The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.助听使用对持续言语处理需求相关的聆听努力和精神疲劳的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):523-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8.

引用本文的文献

1
Breathy Vocal Quality, Background Noise, and Hearing Loss: How Do These Adverse Conditions Affect Speech Perception by Older Adults?呼吸音质、背景噪音与听力损失:这些不利状况如何影响老年人的言语感知?
Ear Hear. 2025;46(2):474-482. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001599. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Note on the Dual-Task Paradigm and its Use to Measure Listening Effort.关于双重任务范式及其用于测量听力努力的说明。
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241292215. doi: 10.1177/23312165241292215.

本文引用的文献

1
Informational Masking and Listening Effort in Speech Recognition in Noise: The Role of Working Memory Capacity and Inhibitory Control in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Impairment.噪声环境下语音识别中的信息掩蔽与聆听努力:工作记忆容量和抑制控制在有听力障碍和无听力障碍老年人中的作用
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Nov 17;65(11):4417-4428. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00674. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
2
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Strengthens Semantic Representations of Foreign Language Tone Words during Initial Stages of Learning.经皮耳迷走神经刺激在学习初始阶段增强外语声调词的语义表征。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Dec 6;34(1):127-152. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01783.
3
A comparison of simultaneously-obtained measures of listening effort: pupil dilation, verbal response time and self-rating.同时获得的听力努力测量指标的比较:瞳孔扩张、言语反应时和自我评估。
Int J Audiol. 2022 Jul;61(7):561-573. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1921290. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
The Contribution of Age, Working Memory Capacity, and Inhibitory Control on Speech Recognition in Noise in Young and Older Adult Listeners.年龄、工作记忆容量和抑制控制对青年和老年听众噪声中语音识别的影响
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Nov 8;64(11):4513-4523. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00251. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
5
Cognitive and Physiological Measures of Listening Effort During Degraded Speech Perception: Relating Dual-Task and Pupillometry Paradigms.在语音感知退化期间的听力努力的认知和生理测量:关联双重任务和瞳孔测量范式。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021 Sep 14;64(9):3627-3652. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00583. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
6
Pupillometry reveals cognitive demands of lexical competition during spoken word recognition in young and older adults.瞳孔测量揭示了年轻人和老年人在口语识别过程中词汇竞争的认知需求。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Feb;29(1):268-280. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01991-0. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
7
Listening Effort Is Not the Same as Speech Intelligibility Score.听力努力程度与言语可懂度评分不同。
Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:23312165211027688. doi: 10.1177/23312165211027688.
8
A Current View on Dual-Task Paradigms and Their Limitations to Capture Cognitive Load.关于双重任务范式及其捕捉认知负荷局限性的当前观点
Front Psychol. 2021 May 20;12:648586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648586. eCollection 2021.
9
The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.《听觉科学中的生态有效性探索:是什么、为什么重要以及如何推进》。
Ear Hear. 2020 Nov/Dec;41 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):5S-19S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000944.
10
Rapid adaptation to fully intelligible nonnative-accented speech reduces listening effort.快速适应完全可理解的非母语口音的言语会减少听力努力。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Sep;73(9):1431-1443. doi: 10.1177/1747021820916726. Epub 2020 May 7.