Hirt Déborah, Urien Saik, Olivier Mathieu, Peyrière Hélène, Nacro Boubacar, Diagbouga Serge, Zoure Emmanuelle, Rouet François, Hien Hervé, Msellati Philippe, Van De Perre Philippe, Tréluyer Jean-Marc
EA3620, Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Oct;53(10):4407-13. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01594-08. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
We aimed in this study to describe efavirenz concentration-time courses in treatment-naïve children after once-daily administration to study the effects of age and body weight on efavirenz pharmacokinetics and to test relationships between doses, plasma concentrations, and efficacy. For this purpose, efavirenz concentrations in 48 children were measured after 2 weeks of didanosine-lamivudine-efavirenz treatment, and samples were available for 9/48 children between months 2 and 5 of treatment. Efavirenz concentrations in 200 plasma specimens were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed with NONMEM. The influence of individual characteristics was tested using a likelihood ratio test. The estimated minimal and maximal concentrations of efavirenz in plasma (Cmin and Cmax, respectively) and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were correlated to the decrease in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels after 3 months of treatment. The threshold Cmin (and AUC) that improved efficacy was determined. The target minimal concentration of 4 mg/liter was considered for toxicity. An optimized dosing schedule that would place the highest percentage of children in the interval of effective and nontoxic concentrations was simulated. The pharmacokinetics of efavirenz was best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The mean apparent clearance and volume of distribution for efavirenz were 0.211 liter/h/kg and 4.48 liters/kg, respectively. Clearance decreased significantly with age. When the recommended doses were given to 46 of the 48 children, 19% (44% of children weighing less than 15 kg) had C(min)s below 1 mg/liter. A significantly higher percentage of children with C(min)s of >1.1 mg/liter or AUCs of >51 mg/liter x h than of children with lower values had viral load decreases greater than 2 log10 copies/ml after 3 months of treatment. Therefore, to optimize the percentage of children with C(min)s between 1.1 and 4 mg/liter, children should receive the following once-daily efavirenz doses: 25 mg/kg of body weight from 2 to 6 years, 15 mg/kg from 6 to 10 years, and 10 mg/kg from 10 to 15 years. These assumptions should be prospectively confirmed.
在本研究中,我们旨在描述初治儿童每日一次服用依非韦伦后的浓度-时间过程,以研究年龄和体重对依非韦伦药代动力学的影响,并测试剂量、血浆浓度与疗效之间的关系。为此,在接受去羟肌苷-拉米夫定-依非韦伦治疗2周后,对48名儿童的依非韦伦浓度进行了测量,并且在治疗的第2至5个月期间获得了48名儿童中9名儿童的样本。使用经过验证的高效液相色谱法测量了200份血浆标本中的依非韦伦浓度。使用NONMEM开发了群体药代动力学模型。使用似然比检验测试个体特征的影响。血浆中依非韦伦的估计最小和最大浓度(分别为Cmin和Cmax)以及浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)与治疗3个月后1型人类免疫缺陷病毒RNA水平的下降相关。确定了提高疗效的阈值Cmin(和AUC)。将4mg/L的目标最小浓度视为毒性浓度。模拟了一种优化的给药方案,该方案可使最高百分比的儿童处于有效和无毒浓度区间内。依非韦伦的药代动力学最好用具有一级吸收和消除的单室模型来描述。依非韦伦的平均表观清除率和分布容积分别为0.211升/小时/千克和4.48升/千克。清除率随年龄显著降低。当向48名儿童中的46名给予推荐剂量时,19%(体重小于15kg的儿童中44%)的C(min)低于1mg/L。治疗3个月后,C(min)>1.1mg/L或AUC>51mg/L·h的儿童中病毒载量下降大于2log10拷贝/ml的百分比显著高于较低值的儿童。因此,为了优化C(min)在1.1至4mg/L之间的儿童百分比,儿童应接受以下每日一次的依非韦伦剂量:2至6岁儿童为25mg/kg体重,6至10岁儿童为15mg/kg,10至15岁儿童为10mg/kg。这些假设应前瞻性地得到证实。