Pressiat Claire, Amorissani-Folquet Madeleine, Yonaba Caroline, Treluyer Jean-Marc, Dahourou Désiré Lucien, Eboua François, Blanche Stéphane, Mea-Assande Véronique, Bouazza Naïm, Foissac Frantz, Malateste Karen, Ouedraogo Sylvie, Lui Gabrielle, Leroy Valériane, Hirt Déborah
Paris Descartes University, EA 7323, Paris, France
Pediatric Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire of Cocody, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Jun 27;61(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00297-17. Print 2017 Jul.
The MONOD ANRS 12206 trial was designated to assess simplification of a successful lopinavir (LPV)-based antiretroviral treatment in HIV-infected children younger than 3 years of age using efavirenz (EFV; 25 mg/kg of body weight/day) to preserve the class of protease inhibitors for children in that age group. In this substudy, EFV concentrations were measured to check the consistency of an EFV dose of 25 mg/kg and to compare it with the 2016 FDA recommended dose. Fifty-two children underwent blood sampling for pharmacokinetic study at 6 months and 12 months after switching to EFV. We applied a Bayesian approach to derive EFV pharmacokinetic parameters using the nonlinear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM) program. The proportion of midinterval concentrations 12 h after drug intake () corresponding to the EFV therapeutic pharmacokinetic thresholds (1 to 4 mg/liter) was assessed according to different dose regimens (25 mg/kg in the MONOD study versus the 2016 FDA recommended dose). With both the 25 mg/kg/day dose and the 2016 FDA recommended EFV dose, simulations showed that the majority of values were within the therapeutic range (62.6% versus 62.8%). However, there were more children underexposed with the 2016 FDA recommended dose (11.6% versus 1.2%). Conversely, there were more concentrations above the threshold of toxicity with the 25 mg/kg dose (36.2% versus 25.6%), with values of up to 15 mg/liter. Only 1 of 52 children was switched back to LPV because of persistent sleeping disorders, but his value was within therapeutic ranges. A high EFV dose of 25 mg/kg per day in children under 3 years old achieved satisfactory therapeutic effective levels. However, the 2016 FDA recommended EFV dose appeared to provide more acceptable safe therapeutic profiles. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01127204.).
MONOD ANRS 12206试验旨在评估使用依非韦伦(EFV;25毫克/千克体重/天)简化针对3岁以下HIV感染儿童成功的基于洛匹那韦(LPV)的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案,以便为该年龄组儿童保留蛋白酶抑制剂类别。在这项子研究中,测量了EFV浓度,以检查25毫克/千克EFV剂量的一致性,并将其与2016年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)推荐剂量进行比较。52名儿童在改用EFV后6个月和12个月接受了用于药代动力学研究的血液采样。我们应用贝叶斯方法,使用非线性混合效应模型(NONMEM)程序得出EFV药代动力学参数。根据不同剂量方案(MONOD研究中的25毫克/千克与2016年FDA推荐剂量)评估药物摄入后12小时的间隔中点浓度()对应于EFV治疗性药代动力学阈值(1至4毫克/升)的比例。使用25毫克/千克/天剂量和2016年FDA推荐的EFV剂量时,模拟显示大多数值都在治疗范围内(分别为62.6%和62.8%)。然而,使用2016年FDA推荐剂量时,暴露不足的儿童更多(分别为11.6%和1.2%)。相反,使用25毫克/千克剂量时,高于毒性阈值的浓度更多(分别为36.2%和25.6%),值高达15毫克/升。52名儿童中只有1名因持续睡眠障碍转回LPV,但他的值在治疗范围内。3岁以下儿童每天25毫克/千克的高EFV剂量达到了令人满意的治疗有效水平。然而,2016年FDA推荐的EFV剂量似乎提供了更可接受的安全治疗概况。(本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,标识符为NCT01127204。)