Mendu Mallika L, McAvay Gail, Lampert Rachel, Stoehr Jonathan, Tinetti Mary E
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8025, USA.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jul 27;169(14):1299-305. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.204.
Syncopal episodes are common among older adults; etiologies range from benign to life threatening. We determined the frequency, yield, and costs of tests obtained to evaluate older persons with syncope. We also calculated the cost per test yield and determined whether the San Francisco syncope rule (SFSR) improved test yield.
Review of 2106 consecutive patients 65 years or older admitted following a syncopal episode.
Electrocardiograms (in 99% of admissions), telemetry (in 95%), cardiac enzyme tests (in 95%), and head computed tomographic (CT) scans (in 63%) were the most frequently obtained tests. Results from cardiac enzymes tests, CT scans, echocardiography, carotid ultrasonography, and electroencephalography all affected diagnosis or management in less than 5% of cases and helped determine the etiology of syncope less than 2% of the time. Postural blood pressure (BP) recording, performed in only 38% of episodes, had the highest yield with respect to affecting diagnosis (18%-26%) or management (25%-30%) and determining etiology of the syncopal episode (15%-21%). The cost per test affecting diagnosis or management was highest for electroencephalography ($32 973), CT scans ($24 881), and cardiac enzymes test ($22 397) and lowest for postural BP recording ($17-$20). The yields and costs for cardiac tests were better among patients meeting, vs those not meeting, the SFSR. For example, the cost per cardiac enzymes test affecting diagnosis or management was $10 331 in those meeting, vs $111 518 in those not meeting, the SFSR.
Many unnecessary tests are obtained to evaluate syncope. Selecting tests based on history and examination and prioritizing less expensive and higher yield tests would ensure a more informed and cost-effective approach to evaluating older patients with syncope.
晕厥发作在老年人中很常见;病因范围从良性到危及生命。我们确定了为评估老年晕厥患者而进行的检查的频率、产出及成本。我们还计算了每项检查产出的成本,并确定旧金山晕厥规则(SFSR)是否提高了检查产出。
回顾2106例65岁及以上因晕厥发作入院的连续患者。
心电图(99%的入院患者进行了该项检查)、遥测(95%)、心肌酶检测(95%)和头部计算机断层扫描(CT)(63%)是最常进行的检查。心肌酶检测、CT扫描、超声心动图、颈动脉超声检查和脑电图检查结果在不到5%的病例中影响诊断或治疗,且在不到2%的时间里有助于确定晕厥病因。仅在38%的发作中进行了体位性血压(BP)记录,其在影响诊断(18% - 26%)或治疗(25% - 30%)以及确定晕厥发作病因(15% - 21%)方面的产出最高。影响诊断或治疗的每项检查成本,脑电图检查(32973美元)、CT扫描(24881美元)和心肌酶检测(22397美元)最高,体位性血压记录(17 - 20美元)最低。符合SFSR的患者与不符合的患者相比,心脏检查的产出和成本更好。例如,符合SFSR的患者中影响诊断或治疗的每项心肌酶检测成本为10331美元,不符合的患者中为111518美元。
为评估晕厥进行了许多不必要的检查。根据病史和体格检查选择检查,并优先进行成本较低且产出较高的检查,将确保以更明智且具成本效益的方式评估老年晕厥患者。