Suppr超能文献

人类eEF1A1和eEF1A2的结构模型揭示了两个不同的序列变异表面簇以及磷酸化方面的潜在差异。

Structural models of human eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 reveal two distinct surface clusters of sequence variation and potential differences in phosphorylation.

作者信息

Soares Dinesh C, Barlow Paul N, Newbery Helen J, Porteous David J, Abbott Catherine M

机构信息

Medical Genetics Section, Molecular Medicine Centre, Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2009 Jul 28;4(7):e6315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006315.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite sharing 92% sequence identity, paralogous human translation elongation factor 1 alpha-1 (eEF1A1) and elongation factor 1 alpha-2 (eEF1A2) have different but overlapping functional profiles. This may reflect the differential requirements of the cell-types in which they are expressed and is consistent with complex roles for these proteins that extend beyond delivery of tRNA to the ribosome.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: To investigate the structural basis of these functional differences, we created and validated comparative three-dimensional (3-D) models of eEF1A1 and eEF1A2 on the basis of the crystal structure of homologous eEF1A from yeast. The spatial location of amino acid residues that vary between the two proteins was thereby pinpointed, and their surface electrostatic and lipophilic properties were compared. None of the variations amongst buried amino acid residues are judged likely to have a major structural effect on the protein fold, or to affect domain-domain interactions. Nearly all the variant surface-exposed amino acid residues lie on one face of the protein, in two proximal but distinct sub-clusters. The result of previously performed mutagenesis in yeast may be interpreted as confirming the importance of one of these clusters in actin-bundling and filament disorganization. Interestingly, some variant residues lie in close proximity to, and in a few cases show differences in interactions with, residues previously inferred to be directly involved in binding GTP/GDP, eEF1Balpha and aminoacyl-tRNA. Additional sequence-based predictions, in conjunction with the 3-D models, reveal likely differences in phosphorylation sites that could reconcile some of the functional differences between the two proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

The revelation and putative functional assignment of two distinct sub-clusters on the surface of the protein models should enable rational site-directed mutagenesis, including homologous reverse-substitution experiments, to map surface binding patches onto these proteins. The predicted variant-specific phosphorylation sites also provide a basis for experimental verification by mutagenesis. The models provide a structural framework for interpretation of the resulting functional analysis.

摘要

背景

尽管人类翻译延伸因子1α-1(eEF1A1)和延伸因子1α-2(eEF1A2)具有92%的序列同一性,但它们具有不同但重叠的功能特征。这可能反映了它们所表达的细胞类型的不同需求,并且与这些蛋白质超出将tRNA递送至核糖体的复杂作用相一致。

方法/主要发现:为了研究这些功能差异的结构基础,我们基于酵母同源eEF1A的晶体结构创建并验证了eEF1A1和eEF1A2的比较三维(3-D)模型。由此确定了两种蛋白质之间不同的氨基酸残基的空间位置,并比较了它们的表面静电和亲脂性质。埋藏的氨基酸残基之间的差异均不太可能对蛋白质折叠产生重大结构影响,或影响结构域-结构域相互作用。几乎所有变异的表面暴露氨基酸残基都位于蛋白质的一个面上,形成两个相邻但不同的亚簇。先前在酵母中进行的诱变结果可以解释为证实了其中一个簇在肌动蛋白束集和细丝解体中的重要性。有趣的是,一些变异残基与先前推断直接参与结合GTP/GDP、eEF1Bα和氨酰-tRNA的残基紧密相邻,并且在少数情况下与这些残基的相互作用存在差异。结合3-D模型的其他基于序列的预测揭示了磷酸化位点可能存在的差异,这可以解释两种蛋白质之间的一些功能差异。

结论

蛋白质模型表面上两个不同亚簇的揭示和假定的功能分配应该能够进行合理的定点诱变,包括同源反向替换实验,以将表面结合位点映射到这些蛋白质上。预测的变异特异性磷酸化位点也为通过诱变进行实验验证提供了基础。这些模型为解释由此产生的功能分析提供了结构框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d9b/2712093/43534fd96142/pone.0006315.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验