• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉狭窄——手术及非手术治疗的循证综述

Carotid artery stenosis-an evidence-based review of surgical and non-surgical treatments.

作者信息

Trivedi Rikin A, Weerakkody Ruwan A, Turner Carole, Kirkpatrick Peter J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Aug;23(4):387-92. doi: 10.1080/02688690902814741.

DOI:10.1080/02688690902814741
PMID:19637009
Abstract

Carotid artery disease underlies a significant proportion of ischaemic strokes. Whilst secondary prevention by drug treatment is the first step in managing patients with known carotid stenoses, evidence from a number of large randomised controlled trials have clearly demonstrated a benefit for surgical treatment in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe stenosis. In asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis a benefit is conferred by surgery in selected patients. Carotid endarterectomy has formed the mainstay of surgical treatment. Endovascular angioplasty (with/without stenting) for carotid stenoses has been proposed as a viable or even superior alternative to carotid endarterectomy. The results from four large randomised controlled trials comparing the two modalities, considered together suggest a marginally better outcome for carotid endarterectomy compared with angioplasty in terms of perioperative mortality and stroke, though the results of further studies are awaited. For carotid surgery, a multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia demonstrated no significant difference in outcome. Refinements in surgical technique such as patch angioplasty and intraluminal shunting provide equivocal benefit, with wide variation in their usage and in the results of studies evaluating them. More robust evidence supporting or refuting a benefit for these techniques is required.

摘要

相当一部分缺血性中风的病因是颈动脉疾病。虽然药物治疗二级预防是已知颈动脉狭窄患者管理的第一步,但多项大型随机对照试验的证据清楚地表明,对于有症状的中重度狭窄患者,手术治疗有益。对于无症状的重度狭窄患者,在部分患者中手术治疗也有益处。颈动脉内膜切除术一直是手术治疗的主要方式。对于颈动脉狭窄,血管内血管成形术(带/不带支架)已被提议作为颈动脉内膜切除术的一种可行甚至更优的替代方案。四项比较这两种方式的大型随机对照试验结果综合来看表明,在围手术期死亡率和中风方面,颈动脉内膜切除术的结果略优于血管成形术,不过仍有待进一步研究结果。对于颈动脉手术,一项评估局部麻醉与全身麻醉使用情况的多中心随机对照试验表明,结果无显著差异。诸如补片血管成形术和腔内分流术等手术技术的改进带来的益处并不明确,其使用情况以及评估它们的研究结果差异很大。需要更有力的证据来支持或反驳这些技术的益处。

相似文献

1
Carotid artery stenosis-an evidence-based review of surgical and non-surgical treatments.颈动脉狭窄——手术及非手术治疗的循证综述
Br J Neurosurg. 2009 Aug;23(4):387-92. doi: 10.1080/02688690902814741.
2
Endarterectomy for preventing stroke in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Review of clinical trials and recommendations for surgical therapy.症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术预防卒中。临床试验综述及手术治疗建议。
Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2(2):147-68.
3
[Carotid stenting: an alternative to surgery?].[颈动脉支架置入术:手术的替代选择?]
Rev Med Suisse. 2009 May 27;5(205):1177-80, 1182-3.
4
How I interpreted the randomised trials of carotid angioplasty/stenting versus endarterectomy.我如何解读颈动脉血管成形术/支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术的随机试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008 Jul;36(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 May 15.
5
[Endarterectomy and carotid angioplasty: surgical perspective].[动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉血管成形术:外科视角]
Rev Neurol. 2001;32(3):266-9.
6
Stent-protected angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy: SPACE2 - a three-arm randomised-controlled clinical trial.无症状性颈动脉狭窄的支架置入保护下血管成形术与动脉内膜切除术对比:SPACE2——一项三臂随机对照临床试验
Int J Stroke. 2009 Aug;4(4):294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00290.x.
7
The evidence for medicine versus surgery for carotid stenosis.治疗颈动脉狭窄采用药物治疗与手术治疗的证据。
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Oct;60(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.021. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
8
Carotid endarterectomy--an evidence-based review [RETIRED]: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.颈动脉内膜切除术——基于证据的综述[已停用]:美国神经病学学会治疗与技术评估小组委员会报告
Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):794-801. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176036.07558.82.
9
[Endarterectomy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a controversial procedure for primary prevention of stroke].无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术:一种用于中风一级预防的有争议的手术
Recenti Prog Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(7-8):477-82.
10
[Natural history and indications for surgery in carotid stenosis].[颈动脉狭窄的自然史及手术指征]
Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125(3):221-7.