Lurie Stephen J, Fogg Thomas T, Dozier Ann M
Office of Curriculum and Assessment, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
Acad Med. 2009 Aug;84(8):1029-35. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ad16d3.
To describe the basic concepts of social network analysis (SNA), which assesses the unique structure of interrelationships among individuals and programs, and introduce some applications of this technique in assessing aspects of institutional culture at a medical center.
The authors applied SNA to three settings at their institution: team function in the intensive care unit, interdisciplinary composition of advisory committees for 53 federal career development awardees, and relationships between key function directors at an institution-wide Clinical Translational Sciences Institute (CTSI). (Key functions are the major administrative units of the CTSI.)
In the ICU setting, SNA provides interpretable summaries of aspects of clinical team functioning. When applied to membership on mentorship committees, it allows for summary descriptions of the degree of interdisciplinarity of various clinical departments. Finally, when applied to relationships among leaders of an institution-wide research enterprise, it highlights potential problem areas in relationships among academic departments. In all cases, data collection is relatively rapid and simple, thereby allowing for the possibility of frequent repeated analyses over time.
SNA provides a useful and standardized set of tools for measuring important aspects of team function, interdisciplinarity, and organizational culture that may otherwise be difficult to measure in an objective way.
描述社会网络分析(SNA)的基本概念,该分析评估个体与项目之间独特的相互关系结构,并介绍此技术在评估医疗中心机构文化方面的一些应用。
作者将SNA应用于其所在机构的三个场景:重症监护病房的团队功能、53名联邦职业发展奖获得者的咨询委员会的跨学科组成,以及全机构临床转化科学研究所(CTSI)关键职能主任之间的关系。(关键职能是CTSI的主要行政单位。)
在重症监护病房场景中,SNA提供了临床团队功能方面的可解释性总结。当应用于指导委员会成员时,它可以对各个临床科室的跨学科程度进行总结描述。最后,当应用于全机构研究企业领导者之间的关系时,它突出了学术部门之间关系中潜在的问题领域。在所有情况下,数据收集相对快速且简单,从而使得随着时间的推移频繁进行重复分析成为可能。
SNA提供了一套有用且标准化的工具,用于衡量团队功能、跨学科性和组织文化的重要方面,否则这些方面可能难以以客观方式进行衡量。