• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年宫颈癌患者生存率低的相关因素:基于日本大阪相对生存模型的人群研究。

Factors relating to poor survival rates of aged cervical cancer patients: a population-based study with the relative survival model in Osaka, Japan.

作者信息

Ioka Akiko, Ito Yuri, Tsukuma Hideaki

机构信息

Department of Cancer Control and Statistics, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Jul-Sep;10(3):457-62.

PMID:19640191
Abstract

Poor survival of older cervical cancer patients has been reported; however, related factors, such as the extent of disease and the competitive risk by aging have not been well evaluated. We applied the relative survival model developed by Dickman et al to resolve this issue. Study subjects were cervical cancer patients retrieved from the Osaka Cancer Registry. They were limited to the 10,048 reported cases diagnosed from 1975 to 1999, based on the quality of data collection on vital status. Age at diagnosis was categorized into <30, 30-54, 55-64, and > or = 65 years. The impact of prognostic factors on 5-year survival was evaluated with the relative survival model, incorporating patients' expected survival in multivariate analysis. The age-specific relative excess risk (RER) of death was significantly higher for older groups as compared with women aged 30-54 years (RER, 1.58 at 55-64 and 2.51 at > or = 65 years). The RER was decreased by 64.8% among the 55-64 year olds as an effect of cancer stage at diagnosis, and by 43.4% among those 65 years old and over. After adding adjustment for treatment modalities, the RER was no longer significantly higher among 55-64 year olds; however, it was still higher among 65 year olds and over. Advanced stage at diagnosis was the main determinant of poor survival among the aged cervical cancer patients, although other factors such as limitations on the combination of treatment were also suggested to have an influence in those aged 65 years and over.

摘要

据报道,老年宫颈癌患者的生存率较低;然而,疾病程度和衰老带来的竞争风险等相关因素尚未得到充分评估。我们应用Dickman等人开发的相对生存模型来解决这一问题。研究对象是从大阪癌症登记处检索到的宫颈癌患者。基于生命状态数据收集的质量,他们仅限于1975年至1999年报告的10048例病例。诊断时的年龄分为<30岁、30 - 54岁、55 - 64岁和≥65岁。使用相对生存模型评估预后因素对5年生存率的影响,在多变量分析中纳入患者的预期生存情况。与30 - 54岁的女性相比,老年组特定年龄的死亡相对超额风险(RER)显著更高(55 - 64岁时RER为1.58,≥65岁时为2.51)。55 - 64岁人群中,由于诊断时的癌症分期,RER降低了64.8%,65岁及以上人群中降低了43.4%。在对治疗方式进行调整后,55 - 64岁人群中的RER不再显著更高;然而,65岁及以上人群中的RER仍然较高。诊断时的晚期是老年宫颈癌患者生存率低的主要决定因素,尽管其他因素如治疗组合的限制也被认为对65岁及以上人群有影响。

相似文献

1
Factors relating to poor survival rates of aged cervical cancer patients: a population-based study with the relative survival model in Osaka, Japan.老年宫颈癌患者生存率低的相关因素:基于日本大阪相对生存模型的人群研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009 Jul-Sep;10(3):457-62.
2
Influence of age on cervical cancer survival in Japan.年龄对日本宫颈癌生存率的影响。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug;35(8):464-9. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyi125. Epub 2005 Jul 8.
3
Epidemiologic and Clinical Analysis of Cervical Cancer Using Data from the Population-Based Osaka Cancer Registry.基于人群的大阪癌症登记处的宫颈癌流行病学和临床分析。
Cancer Res. 2019 Mar 15;79(6):1252-1259. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3109. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Age-specific differences in treatment and survival of patients with cervical cancer in the southeast of The Netherlands, 1986-1996.1986 - 1996年荷兰东南部宫颈癌患者治疗及生存的年龄特异性差异
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Oct;38(15):2041-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00315-5.
5
About invasive cervical cancer: a French population based study between 1998 and 2010.关于浸润性宫颈癌:一项基于1998年至2010年法国人群的研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Aug;191:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 May 12.
6
Net Survival of Elderly Patients with Gynecological Cancer Aged Over 75 Years in 2006-2008.2006 - 2008年75岁以上老年妇科癌症患者的净生存率
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Feb 26;20(2):437-442. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.437.
7
Survival of cervical cancer patients in Germany in the early 21st century: a period analysis by age, histology, and stage.21 世纪初德国宫颈癌患者的生存情况:按年龄、组织学和分期的时期分析。
Acta Oncol. 2012 Sep;51(7):915-21. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.708105. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
8
[Cervical cancer].[宫颈癌]
Nihon Rinsho. 1993 Jan;51 Suppl:793-8.
9
Efficacy and safety of nedaplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for FIGO Stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer and its clinical prognostic factors.奈达铂同步放化疗治疗国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IB2-IVA期宫颈癌的疗效与安全性及其临床预后因素
J Radiat Res. 2015 Mar;56(2):305-14. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rru101. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
10
Population-level trends in relative survival for cervical cancer.宫颈癌相对生存率的人群水平趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Nov;213(5):670.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.07.012. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Survival status of women with cervical cancer in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2024.撒哈拉以南非洲地区宫颈癌女性的生存状况:一项系统评价与荟萃分析,2024年
Front Oncol. 2025 Jan 7;14:1491840. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1491840. eCollection 2024.
2
Predictors of time to death among cervical cancer patients at Tikur Anbesa specialized hospital from 2014 to 2019: A survival analysis.2014 年至 2019 年提克里阿贝贝萨专科医院宫颈癌患者死亡时间的预测因素:生存分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 24;17(2):e0264369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264369. eCollection 2022.
3
Lower accuracy of cytological screening for high-grade squamous intraepithelial neoplasia in women over 50 years of age in Japan.
日本 50 岁以上女性中,细胞学筛查高级别鳞状上皮内瘤变的准确性降低。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;27(2):427-433. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02065-w. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
4
The Incidence and Mortality of Cervical Cancer in Ningbo during 2006-2014, China.2006 - 2014年中国宁波宫颈癌的发病率与死亡率
Iran J Public Health. 2017 Oct;46(10):1324-1331.
5
Changes in prevalence and clinical characteristics of cervical cancer in the People's Republic of China: a study of 10,012 cases from a nationwide working group.中国宫颈癌发病率和临床特征的变化:全国工作组 10012 例病例研究。
Oncologist. 2013;18(10):1101-7. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0123. Epub 2013 Sep 16.