University of California San Diego, Department of Neuroscience, MTF 316, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0624, USA.
Brain Res. 2009 Oct 19;1294:211-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.058. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
In the present study, we used a modification of the rabbit small clot embolic stroke model (RSCEM), a multiple infarct ischemia model to achieve reperfusion (REP) through the internal carotid artery (ICA) following small clot embolization. We determined if increasing regional cortical blood flow (RCBF) following an embolic stroke is beneficial to neurological outcome. We compared this to cerebral reperfusion induced by the administration of the thrombolytic Tenecteplase (TNK, 1.5 mg/kg, IV bolus) in the presence or absence of REP. In this study, we also measured the incidence of ICH following REP and thrombolytic treatment. Following embolization, RCBF was reduced to 48-55% of baseline. When REP was induced by removal of a CCA ligature, RCBF initially increased to 185% of baseline. REP (P(50)=1.18+/-0.43 mg) had no effect on embolization-induced behavior measured 24 h following embolization compared to control (P(50)=1.01+/-0.48 mg). However, TNK treatment (2-hours post-embolization) in the absence or presence of REP (initiated 2 h following embolization) significantly (p<0.05) increased the group P(50) to 2.92+/-0.55 mg and 2.42+/-0.40 mg, respectively. In addition, ICH was increased in the REP (42%, p<0.05) and REP-TNK (35%, p>0.05) group compared to either the control group (5.5%) or TNK group (10%). This study show that reperfusion of ICA can increase RCBF following embolization, but this is not associated with improved neurological outcome measured using quantal analysis. However, TNK administration significantly increased behavioral outcome when given 2 h following embolization; an increase that is not affected by combining TNK with REP.
在本研究中,我们使用改良的兔小栓子栓塞性卒中模型(RSCEM),一种多发性梗死性缺血模型,通过颈内动脉(ICA)内的小栓子栓塞实现再灌注(REP)。我们确定栓塞性卒中后增加局部皮质血流(RCBF)是否对神经功能结果有益。我们将其与存在或不存在 REP 时给予溶栓药物替奈普酶(TNK,1.5mg/kg,静脉推注)引起的脑再灌注进行了比较。在这项研究中,我们还测量了 REP 和溶栓治疗后 ICH 的发生率。栓塞后,RCBF 降低至基线的 48-55%。当通过移除颈总动脉结扎物来诱导 REP 时,RCBF 最初增加到基线的 185%。与对照组(P(50)=1.01+/-0.48mg)相比,REP(P(50)=1.18+/-0.43mg)对栓塞后 24 小时测量的栓塞诱导行为没有影响。然而,TNK 治疗(栓塞后 2 小时),无论是否存在 REP(栓塞后 2 小时开始),均显著(p<0.05)将组 P(50)分别提高至 2.92+/-0.55mg 和 2.42+/-0.40mg。此外,与对照组(5.5%)或 TNK 组(10%)相比,REP(42%,p<0.05)和 REP-TNK(35%,p>0.05)组的 ICH 发生率增加。本研究表明,ICA 再灌注可增加栓塞后 RCBF,但这与使用定量分析测量的神经功能结果改善无关。然而,TNK 给药在栓塞后 2 小时给予时显著增加行为结果;这种增加不受将 TNK 与 REP 联合使用的影响。