Suppr超能文献

肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体受体1基因多态性与癌症易感性:一项基于证据的荟萃分析。

TRAIL-R1 polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility: an evidence-based meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Bo, Liu Shan, Wang Xue-Li, Xu Wei, Li Yan, Zhao Wei-Hong, Wu Jian-Qing

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2009 Sep;45(14):2598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.06.023. Epub 2009 Jul 28.

Abstract

Published data on the association between tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1 or DR4) polymorphisms rs20575 (C626G), rs2230229 (A1322G) and rs20576 (A683C) and cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. A total of nine studies, among which eight articles including 2941 cases and 3358 controls described C626G genotypes, three articles including 736 cases and 668 controls described A1322G genotypes and three studies totalling 1550 cases and 2257 controls described A683C genotypes were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, all three polymorphisms were associated with cancer susceptibility. For C626G polymorphism, there was no association between C626G polymorphism and the risk of cancer in all genetic models when all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In the subgroup analysis by source of controls, statistically significantly reduced cancer risks were found among groups with population-based controls for CG versus CC (OR=0.77, 95% CI:0.65-0.91, P(heterogeneity)=0.007) and dominant model (OR=0.84, 95% CI:0.72-0.99, P(heterogeneity)=0.409). For A1322G polymorphism, we found it was associated with a significantly elevated cancer risk of all cancer types in different genetic models (homozygote comparison: OR=2.80, 95% CI:1.16-6.76, P(heterogeneity)=0.905; dominant model comparison: OR=1.57, 95% CI:1.02-2.41, P(heterogeneity)=0.167; and recessive model comparison: OR=1.22, 95% CI:0.94-1.60, P(heterogeneity)=0.535). Similar results were obtained from A683C polymorphism (homozygote comparison: OR=3.21, 95% CI:1.26-8.20, P(heterogeneity)=0.012; dominant model comparison: OR=1.61, 95% CI: 1.09-2.36, P(heterogeneity)=0.000; and recessive model comparison: OR=2.79, 95% CI: 1.17-6.68, P(heterogeneity)=0.025). In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that TRAIL-R1 C626G polymorphism is marginally associated with cancer susceptibility, and both TRAIL-R1 A1322G G allele and A683C C allele are associated with increased risk for cancer.

摘要

关于肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体受体1(TRAIL-R1或DR4)基因多态性rs20575(C626G)、rs2230229(A1322G)和rs20576(A683C)与癌症风险之间关联的已发表数据尚无定论。为了更精确地估计两者关系,我们进行了一项荟萃分析。本荟萃分析共纳入9项研究,其中8篇文章包含2941例病例和3358例对照,描述了C626G基因型;3篇文章包含736例病例和668例对照,描述了A1322G基因型;3项研究共1550例病例和2257例对照,描述了A683C基因型。总体而言,这三种多态性均与癌症易感性相关。对于C626G多态性,当将所有符合条件的研究纳入荟萃分析时,在所有遗传模型中,C626G多态性与癌症风险之间均无关联。在按对照来源进行的亚组分析中,在以人群为对照的组中,发现CG与CC相比癌症风险有统计学显著降低(OR = 0.77,95%CI:0.65 - 0.91,P(异质性)= 0.007),显性模型中也是如此(OR = 0.84,95%CI:0.72 - 0.99,P(异质性)= 0.409)。对于A1322G多态性,我们发现它在不同遗传模型中与所有癌症类型的癌症风险显著升高相关(纯合子比较:OR = 2.80,95%CI:1.16 - 6.76,P(异质性)= 0.905;显性模型比较:OR = 1.57,95%CI:1.02 - 2.41,P(异质性)= 0.167;隐性模型比较:OR = 1.22,95%CI:0.94 - 1.60,P(异质性)= 0.535)。A683C多态性也得到了类似结果(纯合子比较:OR = 3.21,95%CI:1.26 - 8.20,P(异质性)= 0.012;显性模型比较:OR = 1.61,95%CI:1.09 - 2.36,P(异质性)= 0.000;隐性模型比较:OR = 2.79,95%CI:1.17 - 6.68,P(异质性)= 0.025)综上所述,本荟萃分析表明TRAIL-R1 C626G多态性与癌症易感性存在微弱关联,而TRAIL-R1 A1322G的G等位基因和A683C的C等位基因均与癌症风险增加相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验