• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期获得肝移植服务方面的社会人口统计学差异。

Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.

作者信息

Bryce C L, Angus D C, Arnold R M, Chang C-C H, Farrell M H, Manzarbeitia C, Marino I R, Roberts M S

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2092-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x
PMID:19645706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2880404/
Abstract

The question of whether health care inequities occur before patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are waitlisted for transplantation has not previously been assessed. To determine the impact of gender, race and insurance on access to transplantation, we linked Pennsylvania sources of data regarding adult patients discharged from nongovernmental hospitals from 1994 to 2001. We followed the patients through 2003 and linked information to records from five centers responsible for 95% of liver transplants in Pennsylvania during this period. Using multinomial logistic regressions, we estimated probabilities that patients would undergo transplant evaluation, transplant waitlisting and transplantation itself. Of the 144,507 patients in the study, 4361 (3.0%) underwent transplant evaluation. Of those evaluated, 3071 (70.4%) were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted, 1537 (50.0%) received a transplant. Overall, 57,020 (39.5%) died during the study period. Patients were less likely to undergo evaluation, waitlisting and transplantation if they were women, black and lacked commercial insurance (p < 0.001 each). Differences were more pronounced for early stages (evaluation and listing) than for the transplantation stage (in which national oversight and review occur). For early management and treatment decisions of patients with ESLD to be better understood, more comprehensive data concerning referral and listing practices are needed.

摘要

晚期肝病(ESLD)患者在列入移植等候名单之前是否存在医疗保健不平等的问题此前尚未得到评估。为了确定性别、种族和保险对移植可及性的影响,我们将宾夕法尼亚州1994年至2001年非政府医院出院的成年患者的数据来源进行了关联。我们对这些患者随访至2003年,并将信息与在此期间负责宾夕法尼亚州95%肝脏移植的五个中心的记录进行了关联。使用多项逻辑回归,我们估计了患者接受移植评估、列入移植等候名单以及接受移植本身的概率。在该研究的144,507名患者中,4361名(3.0%)接受了移植评估。在接受评估的患者中,3071名(70.4%)被列入等候名单。在被列入等候名单的患者中,1537名(50.0%)接受了移植。总体而言,57,020名(39.5%)患者在研究期间死亡。女性、黑人且缺乏商业保险的患者接受评估、列入等候名单和接受移植的可能性较小(每项p < 0.001)。早期阶段(评估和列入名单)的差异比移植阶段(进行国家监督和审查)更为明显。为了更好地理解ESLD患者的早期管理和治疗决策,需要有关转诊和列入名单做法的更全面数据。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.早期获得肝移植服务方面的社会人口统计学差异。
Am J Transplant. 2009 Sep;9(9):2092-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
2
Black Patients Have Unequal Access to Listing for Liver Transplantation in the United States.美国的黑人患者在接受肝移植名单方面存在不平等的机会。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1523-1532. doi: 10.1002/hep.31837.
3
Factors Associated With Access to and Receipt of Liver Transplantation in Veterans With End-stage Liver Disease.与终末期肝病退伍军人获得肝移植和接受肝移植相关的因素。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Jul 1;181(7):949-959. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2051.
4
Use of Population-based Data to Demonstrate How Waitlist-based Metrics Overestimate Geographic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Care.利用基于人群的数据来证明基于等候名单的指标如何高估了肝移植护理可及性方面的地理差异。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Oct;16(10):2903-2911. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13820. Epub 2016 May 17.
5
Disparities in Access to Timely Waitlisting Among Pediatric Kidney Transplant Candidates.儿科肾移植候选者及时候补名单获得机会的差异。
Pediatrics. 2024 Sep 1;154(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-065934.
6
Disparities in Kidney Transplant Waitlisting Among Young Patients Without Medical Comorbidities.年轻无合并症患者在肾移植候补名单中的差异。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Nov 1;183(11):1238-1246. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5013.
7
Association of Public Reporting of Medicare Dialysis Facility Quality Ratings With Access to Kidney Transplantation.医疗保险透析机构质量评级公开报告与获得肾脏移植机会的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126719. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26719.
8
Racial Disparity in Liver Transplantation Listing.肝移植登记中的种族差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):526-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.12.021. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
9
Transplant Center Patient Navigator and Access to Transplantation among High-Risk Population: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.移植中心患者导航员和高危人群的移植机会:一项随机对照试验。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Apr 6;13(4):620-627. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08600817. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
10
Access to heart and liver transplantation in the late 1980s.20世纪80年代末心脏和肝脏移植的可及性。
Med Care. 1993 Nov;31(11):1027-42. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199311000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in liver transplant waitlist characteristics and outcomes among Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic adults.与非西班牙裔成年人相比,西班牙裔成年人在肝移植等待名单特征和结果方面的差异。
Front Transplant. 2025 Aug 20;4:1592516. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2025.1592516. eCollection 2025.
2
Sex Differences in Excess Mortality Among Waitlisted Kidney, Heart, and Liver Transplant Candidates.等待肾、心脏和肝脏移植的候选者中过高死亡率的性别差异。
Transplant Direct. 2025 Aug 22;11(9):e1856. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001856. eCollection 2025 Sep.
3
Racial Disparities in Outcomes After Liver Transplantation.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分引入前后肝移植的差异。
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
2
A systematic review of barriers in access to renal transplantation among African Americans in the United States.对美国非裔美国人肾移植获取障碍的系统评价。
Clin Transplant. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6):769-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00568.x.
3
Incorporating biological natural history in simulation models: empirical estimates of the progression of end-stage liver disease.
肝移植术后结局的种族差异
Cureus. 2025 Jul 24;17(7):e88693. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88693. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Geographic variation in utilization of deceased donor livers in the United States in the era of advanced perfusion.在先进灌注时代美国已故捐赠者肝脏利用情况的地域差异。
Liver Transpl. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000687.
5
Access to early liver transplantation is adversely impacted by social determinants of health: A retrospective cohort study.获得早期肝移植受到健康的社会决定因素的不利影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Liver Transpl. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000653.
6
Unveiling Disparities in Heart Failure and Cirrhosis Related Mortality: CDC WONDER 1999 to 2020.揭示心力衰竭和肝硬化相关死亡率的差异:1999年至2020年美国疾病控制与预防中心的相关数据
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Apr 10. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08970-8.
7
Inequity in access to liver transplant care: Time to make the invisible visible.肝移植治疗可及性的不平等:是时候让不可见变为可见了。
Liver Transpl. 2025 May 1;31(5):565-566. doi: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000559. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
8
Quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma-A critical review.肝细胞癌的医疗质量——一项批判性综述
Hepatol Commun. 2024 Dec 11;9(1). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000595. eCollection 2025 Jan 1.
9
Significant Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Outcomes by Race/Ethnicity and Sociodemographic Factors.肝细胞癌结局在种族/民族和社会人口学因素方面存在显著差异。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Feb 6;34(2):355-365. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1094.
10
Improving access to liver transplantation for underserved patients with cirrhosis.改善肝硬化患者中服务不足人群获得肝移植的机会。
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024 Jul 3;23(1):e0248. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000248. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
将生物自然史纳入模拟模型:终末期肝病进展的实证估计
Med Decis Making. 2005 Nov-Dec;25(6):620-32. doi: 10.1177/0272989X05282719.
4
Evaluation for liver transplantation: adherence to AASLD referral guidelines in a large Veterans Affairs center.肝移植评估:大型退伍军人事务中心对美国肝病研究协会转诊指南的遵循情况
Liver Transpl. 2005 Nov;11(11):1370-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.20434.
5
A clinically based discrete-event simulation of end-stage liver disease and the organ allocation process.基于临床的终末期肝病及器官分配过程的离散事件模拟。
Med Decis Making. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):199-209. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04268956.
6
Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.终末期肝病模型(MELD)与供肝分配
Gastroenterology. 2003 Jan;124(1):91-6. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50016.
7
Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS. Final rule.器官获取与移植网络。卫生与公众服务部卫生资源与服务管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1999 Oct 20;64(202):56650-61.
8
A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术患者生存预后不良的模型。
Hepatology. 2000 Apr;31(4):864-71. doi: 10.1053/he.2000.5852.
9
Evidence-based organ allocation.基于证据的器官分配
Am J Med. 1999 Jul;107(1):52-61. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00166-7.
10
Race: a critical factor in organ donation, patient referral and selection, and orthotopic liver transplantation?种族:器官捐献、患者转诊与选择以及原位肝移植中的关键因素?
Liver Transpl Surg. 1998 Nov;4(6):499-505. doi: 10.1002/lt.500040606.