Langius-Eklöf Ann, Samuelsson Mats
School of Health and Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Jun;23(2):375-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00658.x.
The specific aim of this study was to explore if the Sense of Coherence (SOC) Scale reflects and overlaps with standardized psychiatric assessments of depression and anxiety leading to the main hypothesis that the degree of depression decreases while the SOC scores remain stable. Fifteen patients with a diagnosis of major depression according to Axis I in DSM-IV and planned electric convulsive treatment (ECT) participated in the study. The clinician-rated instruments, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Global Assessment of Function (GAF), and the self-assessment instruments such as SOC and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale-Self Rating Scale for Affective Syndromes (CPRS-S-A) were used before and after the treatment. The patients showed statistically significant improvements in clinician-rated depression (p < 0.001) and functional status (p < 0.001), and in self-rated anxiety (p = 0.001) and depression (p = 0.003). There was no significant improvement in SOC (p = 0.213). No significant correlations were found between the SOC scores and any of the measures except for GAF after treatment (r = 0.57, p = 0.039); the lower the SOC scores the greater was the functional dysfunction. In conclusion, the SOC Scale seems not to be a measure of psychopathology in terms of depression or anxiety merely.
本研究的具体目的是探讨连贯感(SOC)量表是否反映了抑郁和焦虑的标准化精神科评估结果并与之重叠,从而得出主要假设:抑郁程度降低而SOC得分保持稳定。15名根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版轴I诊断为重度抑郁症且计划接受电休克治疗(ECT)的患者参与了该研究。在治疗前后使用了临床医生评定的工具,即蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)和功能总体评定量表(GAF),以及自我评定工具,如SOC和综合精神病理学评定量表-情感综合征自评量表(CPRS-S-A)。患者在临床医生评定的抑郁(p < 0.001)和功能状态(p < 0.001)以及自我评定的焦虑(p = 0.001)和抑郁(p = 0.003)方面有统计学上的显著改善。SOC没有显著改善(p = 0.213)。除治疗后的GAF外,未发现SOC得分与任何测量指标之间存在显著相关性(r = 0.57,p = 0.039);SOC得分越低,功能障碍越严重。总之,仅就抑郁或焦虑而言,SOC量表似乎不是一种精神病理学测量工具。