Xu Wenhao, Wang Lubin, Yang Liu, Zhu Yuyang, Chen Pinhong
Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Air Force Medical Center, Air Force Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 19;15:1307408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1307408. eCollection 2024.
Sleep loss has sometimes catastrophic effects on risky decision-making. However, it is unknown to what extent such deficits are exacerbated with increasing duration of sleep deprivation (SD) and whether sustained vigilant attention mediates this sleep deprivation-induced deficit.
The present study aimed to investigate the effect of 36 hours of SD on 37 male college students' arousal, emotion, vigilant attention, and risky decision-making, using the Psychomotor Vigilance Test, the Game of Dice Task, and scales assessing fatigue, sleep, and emotions.
Compared to baseline, SD significantly increased sleepiness, fatigue, and negative emotions, decreased positive emotions and vigilant attention, and led to a shift toward risky decision-making, and these effects often appeared 15 or 20 hours after SD. Interestingly, participants' ability to employ positive feedback was maintained, whereas their performance to utilize negative feedback was impaired even after 8 hours of sleep deprivation. Meanwhile, vigilant attention acted as a mediator between SD and risky decision-making (z = -1.97, 95% [-6.00, -0.30]).
These results suggest that sleep-deprived individuals are unable to use negative feedback to optimize their judgments, which may account for their poor decision-making under risk.
睡眠不足有时会对风险决策产生灾难性影响。然而,尚不清楚随着睡眠剥夺(SD)时长的增加,此类缺陷会在多大程度上加剧,以及持续的警觉性注意力是否介导了这种睡眠剥夺引起的缺陷。
本研究旨在通过精神运动警觉性测试、掷骰子任务以及评估疲劳、睡眠和情绪的量表,探究36小时的睡眠剥夺对37名男性大学生的唤醒、情绪、警觉性注意力和风险决策的影响。
与基线相比,睡眠剥夺显著增加了嗜睡、疲劳和负面情绪,降低了积极情绪和警觉性注意力,并导致了向风险决策的转变,且这些影响通常在睡眠剥夺后15或20小时出现。有趣的是,参与者运用积极反馈的能力得以维持,而即使在睡眠剥夺8小时后,他们利用负面反馈的表现也受到了损害。同时,警觉性注意力在睡眠剥夺和风险决策之间起中介作用(z = -1.97,95% [-6.00, -0.30])。
这些结果表明,睡眠不足的个体无法利用负面反馈来优化他们的判断,这可能解释了他们在风险下决策不佳的原因。