Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
J Anim Sci. 2009 Nov;87(11):3620-9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1739. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
In vitro digestibility techniques have been developed to predict the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of energy and DE content of mixed diets and feedstuffs including barley grain in swine. However, the techniques have not been tested properly for their accuracy in predicting the variation in ATTD of energy and DE content within wheat grain. The objectives were 1) to compare two 3-step in vitro digestibility techniques with either cellulase (IVD-CEL) or Viscozyme (a multienzyme complex to digest fiber; Novozymes, Bagsvaerd, Denmark; IVD-VIS) as the third step, and differing in the amount of enzymes used and the duration of digestion, for their accuracy in predicting ATTD of energy and DM of wheat in grower pigs; and 2) to develop equations to predict ATTD of energy of different batches of wheat. Wheat grain samples (n = 20) with a wide range in quality were collected; the ADF and CP content ranged from 3.3 to 6.2% and from 11.2 to 20.8% (DM basis), respectively. The ATTD of energy was determined using barrows (n = 60, 30.7 +/- 4.7 kg of initial BW) in 2 periods with 6 observations per sample, and ranged from 73.3 to 84.5%. In IVD-CEL, 1 g of ground wheat was digested sequentially in digestion solutions containing pepsin (10 mg/36.5 mL) for 6 h, pancreatin (150 mg/54.5 mL) for 18 h, and cellulase (75 mg/55.5 mL) for 24 h. In IVD-VIS, 0.5 g of ground wheat sample was digested sequentially in solutions containing pepsin (25 mg/36.5 mL) for 2 h, 3 mL of pancreatin (100 mg/54.5 mL) for 6 h, and Viscozyme (0.5 mL/65.3 mL) for 18 h. The in vitro energy and DM digestibility ranged from 79.8 to 91.0% and from 82.0 to 91.5% for IVD-CEL, and ranged from 76.2 to 87.0% and from 79.1 to 89.4% for IVD-VIS, respectively. The R(2) between ATTD of energy and in vitro DM and energy digestibility for IVD-VIS (0.82 and 0.73, respectively) was greater than for IVD-CEL (0.55 and 0.54, respectively). The equation y = 1.05x - 8.85 using the in vitro DM digestibility value from IVD-VIS can predict the ATTD of the energy of wheat in swine with an SE of prediction of 1.2. The relationship between in vitro DM digestibility and grain characteristics such as ADF was stronger for the IVD-VIS than for the IVD-CEL technique (R(2) = 0.89 vs. 0.70). In conclusion, the IVD-VIS, but not the IVD-CEL, technique can accurately (R(2) = 0.82) predict the ATTD of energy in wheat in grower pigs. Therefore, the IVD-VIS technique might be useful as the reference analysis to calibrate analytical equipment to predict the ATTD of energy rapidly in wheat.
体外消化技术已被开发出来,以预测混合日粮和饲料中包括大麦在内的能量和 DE 含量的表观全肠道消化率(ATTD)。然而,这些技术尚未经过适当的测试,以验证其在预测小麦内部能量和 DE 含量的 ATTD 变化方面的准确性。本研究的目的是 1)比较两种 3 步体外消化技术,一种使用纤维素酶(IVD-CEL),另一种使用 Viscozyme(一种用于消化纤维的多酶复合物;诺维信,丹麦 Bagsvaerd;IVD-VIS)作为第三步,在使用的酶量和消化时间上有所不同,以验证其在预测生长猪小麦能量和 DM 消化率方面的准确性;2)开发预测不同批次小麦能量 ATTD 的方程。收集了具有广泛质量范围的小麦粒样本(n = 20);ADF 和 CP 含量范围分别为 3.3%至 6.2%和 11.2%至 20.8%(干物质基础)。使用生长猪(n = 60,初始 BW 为 30.7 ± 4.7 kg)在 2 个时期进行了 6 次观察/样本的测定,能量 ATTD 范围为 73.3%至 84.5%。在 IVD-CEL 中,1 g 粉碎的小麦依次在含有胃蛋白酶(10 mg/36.5 mL)的消化液中消化 6 h,然后在含有胰酶(150 mg/54.5 mL)的消化液中消化 18 h,最后在含有纤维素酶(75 mg/55.5 mL)的消化液中消化 24 h。在 IVD-VIS 中,0.5 g 粉碎的小麦样品依次在含有胃蛋白酶(25 mg/36.5 mL)的消化液中消化 2 h,然后在含有 3 mL 胰酶(100 mg/54.5 mL)的消化液中消化 6 h,最后在含有 Viscozyme(0.5 mL/65.3 mL)的消化液中消化 18 h。IVD-CEL 的体外能量和 DM 消化率范围分别为 79.8%至 91.0%和 82.0%至 91.5%,IVD-VIS 的体外能量和 DM 消化率范围分别为 76.2%至 87.0%和 79.1%至 89.4%。IVD-VIS 的能量 ATTD 与体外 DM 和能量消化率的 R²(分别为 0.82 和 0.73)大于 IVD-CEL(分别为 0.55 和 0.54)。使用 IVD-VIS 的体外 DM 消化率值的方程 y = 1.05x - 8.85 可以预测猪小麦的能量 ATTD,预测误差为 1.2。IVD-VIS 与 IVD-CEL 技术相比,体外 DM 消化率与谷物特性(如 ADF)的关系更强(R²=0.89 对 0.70)。总之,IVD-VIS 技术(而不是 IVD-CEL 技术)可以准确(R²=0.82)预测生长猪小麦的能量 ATTD。因此,IVD-VIS 技术可能是有用的参考分析方法,可以校准分析设备,以快速预测小麦的能量 ATTD。