Scottish Primate Research Group, Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, Fife, Scotland, UK.
Anim Cogn. 2010 Mar;13(2):287-301. doi: 10.1007/s10071-009-0266-4. Epub 2009 Aug 1.
Great ape gestures have attracted considerable research interest in recent years, prompted by their flexible and intentional pattern of use; but almost all studies have focused on single gestures. Here, we report the first quantitative analysis of sequential gesture use in western gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), using data from three captive groups and one African study site. We found no evidence that gesture sequences were given for reasons of increased communicative efficiency over single gestures. Longer sequences of repeated gestures did not increase the likelihood of response, and using a sequence was seldom in reaction to communicative failure. Sequential combination of two gestures with similar meanings did not generally increase effectiveness, and sometimes reduced it. Gesture sequences were closely associated with play contexts. Markov transition analysis showed two networks of frequently co-occurring gestures, both consisting of gestures used to regulate play. One network comprised only tactile gestures, the other a mix of silent, audible and tactile gestures; apparently, these clusters resulted from gesture use in play with proximal or distal contact, respectively. No evidence was found for syntactic effects of sequential combination: meanings changed little or not at all. Semantically, many gestures overlapped massively with others in their core information (i.e. message), and gesture messages spanned relatively few functions. We suggest that the underlying semantics of gorilla gestures is highly simplified compared to that of human words. Gesture sequences allow continual adjustment of the tempo and nature of social interactions, rather than generally conveying semantically referential information or syntactic structures.
近年来,由于大型猿类的手势具有灵活且有意的使用模式,因此引起了相当多的研究兴趣;但几乎所有的研究都集中在单个手势上。在这里,我们报告了首次对西部大猩猩(Gorilla gorilla gorilla)连续使用手势的定量分析,该研究使用了来自三个圈养群体和一个非洲研究地点的数据。我们没有发现证据表明手势序列是为了提高单个手势的沟通效率而产生的。重复手势的较长序列并不能增加得到回应的可能性,并且使用序列很少是为了应对沟通失败。具有相似含义的两个手势的连续组合通常不会增加效果,有时反而会降低效果。手势序列与游戏情境密切相关。马尔可夫转移分析显示出两个经常同时出现的手势网络,都由用于调节游戏的手势组成。一个网络仅包含触觉手势,另一个网络则由无声、有声和触觉手势组成;显然,这些簇是由于与近端或远端接触分别进行游戏而产生的。没有证据表明连续组合具有句法效应:含义几乎没有变化或根本没有变化。从语义上讲,许多手势在其核心信息(即消息)上与其他手势重叠巨大,并且手势消息涵盖的功能相对较少。我们认为,与人类单词相比,大猩猩手势的潜在语义被高度简化。手势序列允许持续调整社交互动的节奏和性质,而不是通常传达语义上的参考信息或句法结构。