Origins of Mind Group, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 26;377(1860):20210301. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0301. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Opinion piece: ape gestures are made intentionally, inviting parallels with human language; but how similar are their gestures to words? Here we ask this in three ways, considering: flexibility and ambiguity, first- and second-order intentionality, and usage in interactive exchanges. Many gestures are used to achieve several, often very distinct, goals. Such apparent ambiguity in meaning is potentially disruptive for communication, but-as with human language-situational and interpersonal context may largely resolve the intended meaning. Our evidence for first-order intentional use of gesture is abundant, but how might we establish a case for the second-order intentional use critical to language? Finally, words are rarely used in tidy signal-response sequences but are exchanged in back-and-forth interaction. Do gestures share this property? In this paper, we examine these questions and set out ways in which they can be resolved, incorporating data from wild chimpanzees. This article is part of the theme issue 'Cognition, communication and social bonds in primates'.
猿类的手势是有意做出的,这让人联想到人类语言;但它们的手势与语言有多么相似呢?在这里,我们从三个方面来探讨这个问题,分别是灵活性和模糊性、一阶和二阶意向性以及在互动交流中的使用。许多手势被用于实现多个目标,这些目标往往非常不同。这种明显的模糊含义可能会对交流造成干扰,但就像人类语言一样,情境和人际语境可能在很大程度上解决了意图的含义。我们有大量关于手势一阶意向使用的证据,但我们如何确定对语言至关重要的二阶意向使用的案例呢?最后,单词很少用于整洁的信号-响应序列,而是在一来一往的互动中进行交换。手势是否具有这种特性呢?在本文中,我们将探讨这些问题并提出解决这些问题的方法,其中包括来自野生黑猩猩的数据。本文是主题为“灵长类动物的认知、交流和社会关系”的一部分。