van der Veek Shelley M C, Kraaij Vivian, Garnefski Nadia
Academic Medical Center Amsterdam Leider University, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009 Aug;47(4):295-306. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-47.4.295.
The purpose of this study was to explore the cross-sectional and prospective relationships between cognitive coping strategies and parental stress in parents of children with Down syndrome. A total of 621 participants filled out questionnaires, including the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire to measure cognitive coping and the Nijmeegse Ouderlijke Stress Index-Korte Versie (A. J. L. L. De Brock, A. A. Vermulst, J. R. M. Gerris, & R. R. Abidin, 1992) to measure parental stress. After 8 months, stress was measured again. Cross-sectionally, using acceptance, rumination, positive refocusing, refocusing on planning, and catastrophizing to a greater extent was related to more stress, whereas using positive reappraisal more often was related to less stress. Prospectively, acceptance and catastrophizing were related to more stress, whereas positive reappraisal was related to less stress. Implications for future research and prevention and intervention activities are discussed.
本研究的目的是探讨唐氏综合征患儿父母的认知应对策略与父母压力之间的横断面关系和前瞻性关系。共有621名参与者填写了问卷，包括用于测量认知应对的认知情绪调节问卷，以及用于测量父母压力的奈梅亨父母压力指数简版（A. J. L. L. 德布罗克、A. A. 弗穆尔斯特、J. R. M. 杰里斯和R. R. 阿比丁，1992年）。8个月后，再次测量压力。横断面分析表明，更多地使用接受、沉思、积极重新聚焦、专注于计划和灾难化思维与更多压力相关，而更频繁地使用积极重新评价则与较少压力相关。前瞻性分析表明，接受和灾难化思维与更多压力相关，而积极重新评价与较少压力相关。文中还讨论了对未来研究以及预防和干预活动的启示。
