Suppr超能文献

我的患者是否患有艰难梭菌感染?

Does my patient have Clostridium difficile infection?

作者信息

Peterson Lance R, Robicsek Ari

机构信息

Northwestern University and NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):176-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-3-200908040-00005.

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) seems to be changing-with increasing virulence and incidence, more resistance to metronidazole, and worse outcomes. Accurate diagnosis is critical, but 3 common misconceptions lead to misdiagnosis: Clostridium difficile infection is a possibility when the patient has fewer than 3 loose stools per day; the glutamate dehydrogenase test for CDI is sensitive and thus is a good initial test; and repeating an insensitive laboratory test for CDI is useful. These misconceptions can lead to missed diagnoses (for example, when tests with low sensitivity are used) and to false diagnoses (for example, when tests are done in patients who are unlikely to have CDI because they have minimal diarrhea or negative results on recent tests). Diagnoses of CDI will be more accurate if clinicians use tests with a higher sensitivity, reduce the frequency of testing for a single episode of diarrhea, and give more attention to key elements of the patient's history.

摘要

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)似乎正在发生变化——毒力和发病率不断增加,对甲硝唑的耐药性增强,且预后更差。准确诊断至关重要,但有3个常见的误解会导致误诊:当患者每天腹泻少于3次时,艰难梭菌感染是有可能的;用于CDI的谷氨酸脱氢酶检测很敏感,因此是一项很好的初始检测;重复进行对CDI不敏感的实验室检测是有用的。这些误解可能导致漏诊(例如,当使用低灵敏度检测时)和误诊(例如,当对不太可能患有CDI的患者进行检测时,因为他们腹泻轻微或近期检测结果为阴性)。如果临床医生使用灵敏度更高的检测方法,减少对单次腹泻发作的检测频率,并更多地关注患者病史的关键要素,CDI的诊断将更加准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验