Boly Frances J, Reske Kimberly A, Kwon Jennie H
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2020 Mar;22(3). doi: 10.1007/s11908-020-0715-4. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Accurate and timely diagnosis of infection (CDI) is imperative to prevent transmission and reduce morbidity and mortality due to CDI, but CDI laboratory diagnostics are complex. The purpose of this article is to review the role of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of CDI, and the role of diagnostic stewardship in optimization of testing.
Results from diagnostic tests should be interpreted with an understanding of the strengths and limitations inherent in each testing approach. Use of highly sensitive molecular diagnostic tests without accounting for clinical signs and symptoms may lead to over-diagnosis of CDI and increased facility CDI rates. Current guidelines recommend a two-step, algorithmic approach for testing. Diagnostic stewardship interventions, such as education, order sets, order search menus, reflex orders, hard and soft stop alerts, electronic references, feedback and benchmarking, decision algorithms, and predictive analytics may help improve use of laboratory tests and CDI diagnosis. The diagnostic stewardship approaches with the highest reported success rates include computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) interventions, face-to-face feedback, and real-time evaluations.
CDI is a clinical diagnosis supported by laboratory findings. Together, clinical evaluation combined with diagnostic stewardship can optimize the accurate diagnosis of CDI.
准确及时地诊断艰难梭菌感染(CDI)对于预防传播以及降低CDI所致的发病率和死亡率至关重要,但CDI的实验室诊断很复杂。本文旨在综述实验室检测在CDI诊断中的作用,以及诊断管理在优化检测方面的作用。
诊断检测结果的解读应结合对每种检测方法固有优缺点的理解。在不考虑临床体征和症状的情况下使用高灵敏度分子诊断检测可能会导致CDI的过度诊断以及医疗机构CDI发生率的增加。当前指南推荐采用两步法、基于算法的检测方法。诊断管理干预措施,如教育、医嘱集、医嘱搜索菜单、自动追加医嘱、硬停止和软停止警报、电子参考文献、反馈和基准比较、决策算法以及预测分析等,可能有助于改善实验室检测的使用及CDI诊断。报道成功率最高的诊断管理方法包括计算机化临床决策支持(CCDS)干预、面对面反馈和实时评估。
CDI是一种由实验室检查结果支持的临床诊断。临床评估与诊断管理相结合可优化CDI的准确诊断。