Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Eur J Health Econ. 2010 Jun;11(3):343-50. doi: 10.1007/s10198-009-0171-4. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
The Irish health care system is typically described as complex and inequitable and yet the source of the complexity is difficult to identify. This paper examines and documents the way in which the structure of the Irish system is complicated when compared with other countries. Analysis is conducted in the context of the 'health basket' framework. A health basket describes which health care services, and which individuals, are covered by public funding, and to what extent. The Irish health basket is outlined along three dimensions of breadth, depth, and height, and compared with the health baskets of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Sweden and France. Results indicate that it is in the combination of breadth and height that distinguishes the Irish basket from others. The majority of Irish health care services are run on a cost sharing basis; user fees are higher than in other countries particularly in primary care; and the structure of entitlement restrictions are complex. It is difficult to identify other countries in which all these factors operate within one system. In addition, the way in which the Irish health basket is delivered in practice introduces further complexities into the breadth and height of coverage.
爱尔兰的医疗保健系统通常被描述为复杂和不公平的,但其复杂性的根源却难以确定。本文考察并记录了与其他国家相比,爱尔兰系统的结构是如何变得复杂的。分析是在“健康篮子”框架内进行的。健康篮子描述了公共资金覆盖哪些医疗服务和哪些个人,以及覆盖的程度。爱尔兰的健康篮子沿着广度、深度和高度三个维度进行了概述,并与英国、加拿大、澳大利亚、瑞典和法国的健康篮子进行了比较。结果表明,正是广度和高度的结合使爱尔兰的篮子有别于其他篮子。爱尔兰的大多数医疗服务都是按成本分担的方式运作的;与其他国家相比,爱尔兰的用户费用更高,特别是在初级保健方面;而且,资格限制的结构也很复杂。很难找到在一个系统中所有这些因素都存在的其他国家。此外,爱尔兰健康篮子在实践中的交付方式进一步增加了覆盖范围的广度和高度的复杂性。