Department of Finance, School of Business, University of Connecticut, 2100 Hillside Road, Storrs, CT 06269-1041, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):2148-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01006.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
To examine if a minimum efficient scale (MES) holds with respect to the population serviced by a local health department (LHD) given the congestability, externality, and scale/scope economy effects potentially associated with public health services.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: A nationally representative sample of LHDs in 2005.
Multiple regression analysis is used to isolate the relation between population and spending while controlling for other factors known to influence local public health costs.
Data were obtained from the 2005 National Profile of Local Public Health Agencies, a project supported through a cooperative agreement between the National Association of County and City Health Officials and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The MES of a local public health department is approximately 100,000 people. After that size, additional population has little impact on public health spending per capita.
Seventy-seven percent of LHDs in the sample fall below the 100,000 MES. Higher levels of government may want to provide financial inducements so that smaller LHDs consolidate or enter into agreements with larger public health organizations to provide services.
鉴于公共卫生服务可能存在拥挤性、外部性以及规模/范围经济性,检验地方卫生部门(LHD)所服务的人群是否符合最小有效规模(MES)。
数据来源/研究范围:2005 年具有全国代表性的 LHD 样本。
采用多元回归分析来分离人口与支出之间的关系,同时控制其他已知影响地方公共卫生费用的因素。
数据来自于 2005 年国家地方公共卫生机构概况,该项目是国家县和市卫生官员协会与疾病控制与预防中心之间的合作协议的一部分。
地方公共卫生部门的 MES 约为 10 万人。在此规模之后,人口的增加对人均公共卫生支出的影响很小。
在样本中,77%的 LHD 低于 10 万人的 MES。更高一级的政府可能希望提供财政激励措施,以使较小的 LHD 合并或与更大的公共卫生组织达成协议以提供服务。