• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving disparity estimates for rare racial/ethnic groups with trend estimation and Kalman filtering: an application to the National Health Interview Survey.利用趋势估计和卡尔曼滤波改进对罕见种族/族裔群体的差异估计:在国家健康访谈调查中的应用
Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1622-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01000.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
2
State-specific prevalence of selected health behaviors, by race and ethnicity--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997.按种族和族裔划分的特定州选定健康行为的患病率——行为风险因素监测系统,1997年
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2000 Mar 24;49(2):1-60.
3
Disparities in Adult Cigarette Smoking - United States, 2002-2005 and 2010-2013.成年人吸烟差异 - 美国,2002-2005 年和 2010-2013 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Aug 5;65(30):753-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6530a1.
4
Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997-2000.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民健康行为监测。行为风险因素监测系统的调查结果,1997 - 2000年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2003 Aug 1;52(7):1-13.
5
Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002.背痛患病率与就诊率:2002年美国全国性调查的估计数据
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2724-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244618.06877.cd.
6
Tobacco use among U.S. racial/ethnic minority groups--African Americans, American Indians and Alaska Natives, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, Hispanics. A Report of the Surgeon General. Executive summary.美国少数族裔群体中的烟草使用情况——非裔美国人、美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民、亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民、西班牙裔。美国卫生局局长报告。执行摘要。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1998 Oct 9;47(RR-18):v-xv, 1-16.
7
Comparing racial and ethnic populations based on Healthy People 2010 objectives.基于《健康人民2010》目标比较不同种族和族裔人群。
Healthy People Stat Notes. 2008 Aug(26):1-16.
8
Office of Management and Budget racial categories and implications for American Indians and Alaska Natives.管理和预算办公室的种族类别及其对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1720-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1720.
9
Prostate Cancer Screening Among American Indians and Alaska Natives: The Health and Retirement Survey, 1996-2008.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民中的前列腺癌筛查:健康与退休调查,1996 - 2008年
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Aug 6;12:E123. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150088.
10
Asthma prevalence among US children in underrepresented minority populations: American Indian/Alaska Native, Chinese, Filipino, and Asian Indian.美国儿童中代表性不足的少数族裔群体(美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、华裔、菲律宾裔和印度裔)的哮喘患病率。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e217-22. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3825.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations Between Leisure-Time Physical Activity and Mortality by Sociodemographic Factors.按社会人口学因素划分的休闲时间身体活动与死亡率之间的关联
J Phys Act Health. 2025 Jan 28;22(4):485-492. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2024-0511. Print 2025 Apr 1.
2
Indicators of inequity: Exploring the complexities of operationalizing area-level structural racism.不平等指标:探索实施地区层面结构性种族主义的复杂性。
SSM Popul Health. 2024 Jul 25;27:101701. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2024.101701. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Building Trust: Strategies for Recruiting Underrepresented Populations in Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic.建立信任:在新冠疫情期间招募研究中代表性不足人群的策略
Int J Transl Med Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 29;7(1). doi: 10.21106/ijtmrph.446. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
Measuring Patient-Centeredness of Care for Seriously Ill Individuals: Challenges and Opportunities for Accountability Initiatives.衡量对重病患者的以患者为中心的护理:问责制倡议的挑战和机遇。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Mar;21(S2):S28-S35. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0452. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
The Modified Kalman Filter Macro: User's Guide.改进型卡尔曼滤波器宏:用户指南。
Rand Health Q. 2012 Mar 1;2(1):18. eCollection 2012 Spring.
6
Beyond black and white: race/ethnicity and health status among older adults.超越黑白之分:老年人中的种族/族裔与健康状况
Am J Manag Care. 2014 Mar;20(3):239-48.
7
Statistical benchmarks for health care provider performance assessment: a comparison of standard approaches to a hierarchical Bayesian histogram-based method.卫生保健提供者绩效评估的统计基准:标准方法与基于分层贝叶斯直方图的方法比较。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun;49(3):1056-73. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12149. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
8
Data and measurement issues in the analysis of health disparities.卫生差异分析中的数据和测量问题。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 2):1489-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01143.x. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
2
Estimating health conditions for small areas: asthma symptom prevalence for state legislative districts.小区域健康状况评估:州立法选区的哮喘症状患病率
Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec;42(6 Pt 2):2389-409. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00793.x.
3
Assessing the value of the NHIS for studying changes in state coverage policies: the case of New York.评估国家健康保险计划(NHIS)在研究州覆盖政策变化方面的价值:以纽约州为例。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec;42(6 Pt 2):2332-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00767.x.
4
Methodological issues in measuring health disparities.衡量健康差异中的方法学问题。
Vital Health Stat 2. 2005 Jul(141):1-16.
5
Measuring progress in Healthy People 2010.衡量《2010年美国人健康指标》的进展情况。
Healthy People 2010 Stat Notes. 2004 Sep(25):1-16.

利用趋势估计和卡尔曼滤波改进对罕见种族/族裔群体的差异估计:在国家健康访谈调查中的应用

Improving disparity estimates for rare racial/ethnic groups with trend estimation and Kalman filtering: an application to the National Health Interview Survey.

作者信息

Elliott Marc N, McCaffrey Daniel F, Finch Brian K, Klein David J, Orr Nate, Beckett Megan K, Lurie Nicole

机构信息

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 1):1622-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01000.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01000.x
PMID:19656232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2754551/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Single-year estimates of health disparities in small racial/ethnic groups are often insufficiently precise to guide policy, whereas estimates that are pooled over multiple years may not accurately describe current conditions. While collecting additional data is costly, innovative analytic approaches may improve the accuracy and utility of existing data. We developed an application of the Kalman filter in order to make more efficient use of extant data.

DATA SOURCE

We used 1997-2004 National Health Interview Survey data on the prevalence of health outcomes for two racial/ethnic subgroups: American Indians/Alaska Natives and Chinese Americans.

STUDY DESIGN

We modified the Kalman filter to generate more accurate current-year prevalence estimates for small racial/ethnic groups by efficiently aggregating past years of cross-sectional survey data within racial/ethnic groups. We compared these new estimates and their accuracy to simple current-year prevalence estimates.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

For 18 of 19 outcomes, the modified Kalman filter approach reduced the error of current-year estimates for each of the two groups by 20-35 percent-equivalent to increasing current-year sample sizes for these groups by 56-135 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach could increase the accuracy of health measures for small groups using extant data, with virtually no additional cost other than those related to analytical processes.

摘要

目的

对少数种族/族裔群体健康差异的单年估计往往不够精确,无法为政策提供指导,而多年汇总的估计可能无法准确描述当前状况。虽然收集更多数据成本高昂,但创新的分析方法可能会提高现有数据的准确性和实用性。我们开发了一种卡尔曼滤波器应用程序,以便更有效地利用现有数据。

数据来源

我们使用了1997 - 2004年国家健康访谈调查数据,这些数据涉及两个种族/族裔亚组的健康结果患病率:美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民和华裔美国人。

研究设计

我们对卡尔曼滤波器进行了修改,通过有效汇总种族/族裔群体过去几年的横断面调查数据,为少数种族/族裔群体生成更准确的当年患病率估计值。我们将这些新估计值及其准确性与简单的当年患病率估计值进行了比较。

主要发现

对于19项结果中的18项,改进后的卡尔曼滤波器方法将两组中每组当年估计值的误差降低了20% - 35%,这相当于将这些组的当年样本量增加了56% - 135%。

结论

这种方法可以提高利用现有数据对少数群体健康指标的测量准确性,除了与分析过程相关的成本外,几乎没有额外成本。