Roĭtbak A I
Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova. 1990 Dec;76(12):1806-15.
Cynically violating the principles of science, the organizers of the scientific session of the USSR Acad. Sci. and Acad. Med. Sci. in 1950 made an attempt to make null and void of the contributions of Academician I. S. Beritashvili and his associates to the physiological science. At the special sessions of the "Pavlovian Council" in April 1951, Beritashvili's concept on the psychonervous activity was qualified as anti-Pavlovian, idealistic. The hypothesis developed by him and his associated on the process of inhibition was rejected as dualistic; the use of the notion "spontaneous electrical activity" was qualified as the deviation from the principles of determinism. In the resolution adopted, "vicious aims" of I. S. Beritashvili were censured, and soon he was exempted from the post of Director of the Institute of Physiology. The campaign against I. S. Beritashvili and his School ceased in 1953; it proved to be a vivid example of the form of leadership pernicious for science.
1950年,苏联科学院和医学科学院科学会议的组织者玩世不恭地违反科学原则,企图抹杀伊·斯·贝里塔什维利院士及其同事对生理学的贡献。1951年4月,在“巴甫洛夫委员会”的特别会议上,贝里塔什维利关于心理神经活动的概念被判定为反巴甫洛夫的、唯心主义的。他和他的同事们提出的关于抑制过程的假说被斥为二元论而遭到摒弃;“自发电活动”这一概念的使用被判定为背离了决定论原则。在通过的决议中,伊·斯·贝里塔什维利的“不良企图”受到谴责,不久他便被免去了生理研究所所长的职务。针对伊·斯·贝里塔什维利及其学派的运动于1953年停止;这是对科学有害的领导方式的一个生动例证。