• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙利度胺与泼尼松龙治疗中度至重度麻风结节性红斑的疗效比较:一项随机研究。

Comparative efficacy of thalidomide and prednisolone in the treatment of moderate to severe erythema nodosum leprosum: a randomized study.

作者信息

Kaur Inderjeet, Dogra Sunil, Narang Tarun, De Dipankar

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Australas J Dermatol. 2009 Aug;50(3):181-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2009.00534.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-0960.2009.00534.x
PMID:19659979
Abstract

The present study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of thalidomide to that of oral prednisolone in the treatment of moderate to severe type 2 lepra reaction. Sixty patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of erythema nodosum leprosum with a clinical score of 4 or more (i.e. moderate to severe type 2 reaction) were randomly allocated to two groups comprising 30 patients each. Group 1 patients were given thalidomide at a dose of 300 mg/day for 1 week and the dose was gradually reduced, and Group 2 received prednisolone 40 mg daily for 2 weeks, which was tapered by 10 mg every 2 weeks. Thalidomide induced a faster clinical response (cutaneous as well as systemic) compared with prednisolone. Patients taking thalidomide had fewer relapses and a longer period of remission than those receiving prednisolone.

摘要

本研究旨在比较沙利度胺与口服泼尼松龙治疗中度至重度2型麻风反应的疗效和安全性。60例经组织学确诊为结节性红斑麻风且临床评分4分或更高(即中度至重度2型反应)的患者被随机分为两组,每组30例。第1组患者给予沙利度胺,剂量为300mg/天,持续1周,然后逐渐减量;第2组患者接受泼尼松龙40mg/天,持续2周,每2周减量10mg。与泼尼松龙相比,沙利度胺诱导的临床反应(皮肤及全身)更快。服用沙利度胺的患者比接受泼尼松龙的患者复发更少,缓解期更长。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of thalidomide and prednisolone in the treatment of moderate to severe erythema nodosum leprosum: a randomized study.沙利度胺与泼尼松龙治疗中度至重度麻风结节性红斑的疗效比较:一项随机研究。
Australas J Dermatol. 2009 Aug;50(3):181-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2009.00534.x.
2
Erythema nodosum leprosum in Nepal: a retrospective study of clinical features and response to treatment with prednisolone or thalidomide.尼泊尔的麻风结节性红斑:一项关于临床特征及对泼尼松龙或沙利度胺治疗反应的回顾性研究。
Lepr Rev. 2008 Sep;79(3):254-69.
3
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled dose comparison of thalidomide for treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum.沙利度胺治疗麻风结节性红斑的随机、双盲、双模拟、对照剂量比较研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 May;72(5):518-26.
4
Severe form of type 2 reaction in patients of Hansen's disease after withdrawal of thalidomide: case reports.沙利度胺停药后麻风病患者发生的严重2型反应:病例报告
Indian J Lepr. 2009 Oct-Dec;81(4):199-203.
5
[Pentoxifylline in the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum: results of an open study].[己酮可可碱治疗麻风结节性红斑:一项开放性研究的结果]
Acta Leprol. 2003;12(3):117-22.
6
Role of azathioprine in preventing recurrences in a patient of recurrent erythema nodosum leprosum.硫唑嘌呤在预防一名复发性瘤型麻风反应患者复发中的作用。
Lepr Rev. 2006 Sep;77(3):225-9.
7
[Treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum using thalidomide].[使用沙利度胺治疗麻风结节性红斑]
Acta Leprol. 1983 Jan-Mar;1(1):41-50.
8
Pentoxifylline in the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum.己酮可可碱治疗麻风结节性红斑。
J Dermatol. 2003 Jan;30(1):64-8.
9
Erythema nodosum leprosum and HIV infection: A therapeutic experience.麻风结节性红斑与HIV感染:治疗经验
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 2005 Sep;73(3):189-93.
10
[Study of erythema nodosum leprosum].[麻风结节性红斑的研究]
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1994;121(2):194-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Localised erythema nodosum leprosum-A rare entity managed with thalidomide.局限性麻风结节性红斑——一种用沙利度胺治疗的罕见病症。
Skin Health Dis. 2024 Feb 7;4(2):e339. doi: 10.1002/ski2.339. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Methotrexate as a corticosteroid-sparing agent in leprosy reactions: A French multicenter retrospective study.氨甲蝶呤作为麻风反应中皮质类固醇的辅助药物:一项法国多中心回顾性研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Apr 20;17(4):e0011238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011238. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
A critical appraisal of the ENLIST severity scale for erythema nodosum leprosum.
对麻风结节性红斑ENLIST严重程度量表的批判性评估。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Apr 26;16(4):e0010378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010378. eCollection 2022 Apr.
4
Cancer therapies based on targeted protein degradation - lessons learned with lenalidomide.基于靶向蛋白降解的癌症疗法——来那度胺的经验教训。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul;18(7):401-417. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00479-z. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Methotrexate and prednisolone study in erythema nodosum leprosum (MaPs in ENL) protocol: a double-blind randomised clinical trial.麻风结节性红斑中甲氨蝶呤和泼尼松龙的研究(MaPs 在 ENL 中的研究)方案:一项双盲随机临床试验。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 17;10(11):e037700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037700.
6
Thalidomide in the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) in an outpatient setting: A five-year retrospective analysis from a leprosy referral centre in India.沙利度胺治疗门诊结节性红斑麻风反应(ENL):来自印度麻风病转诊中心的五年回顾性分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 9;14(10):e0008678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008678. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Infection risk of dermatologic therapeutics during the COVID-19 pandemic: an evidence-based recalibration.COVID-19 大流行期间皮肤科治疗药物的感染风险:基于证据的重新调整。
Int J Dermatol. 2020 Sep;59(9):1043-1056. doi: 10.1111/ijd.15028. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
8
Widespread Dermatophytosis in a Patient Treated for Leprosy Type II Reactional State after MDT/WHO-MB Release.在多药联合化疗/世界卫生组织多菌型麻风释放后接受II型反应性麻风病治疗的患者中出现广泛皮肤癣菌病。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Oct;99(4):813-814. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0280.
9
A leprosy clinical severity scale for erythema nodosum leprosum: An international, multicentre validation study of the ENLIST ENL Severity Scale.结节性红斑型麻风的麻风临床严重程度量表:ENLIST ENL严重程度量表的国际多中心验证研究
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Jul 3;11(7):e0005716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005716. eCollection 2017 Jul.
10
Expression of CD64 on Circulating Neutrophils Favoring Systemic Inflammatory Status in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum.循环中性粒细胞上CD64的表达有利于结节性红斑狼疮的全身炎症状态。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Aug 24;10(8):e0004955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004955. eCollection 2016 Aug.