Park H S, Cho Y S, Park J N, Baik J H, Rhu N S, Cho D I, Kim J W
Department of Chest Medicine, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 1990 Dec;5(4):185-8. doi: 10.3346/jkms.1990.5.4.185.
Current asthma is often diagnostically excluded by the presence of normal bronchial responsiveness. We report on a TDI-induced occupational asthma patient with normal bronchial responsiveness. He had suffered from shortness of breath during and after TDI exposure for several months. His initial methacholine bronchial challenge test showed a negative response. The bronchoprovacation test with TDI showed an isolated immediate bronchoconstriction. The following methacholine bronchial challenge tests revealed that the bronchial hyperresponsiveness developed seven hours after the TDI challenge (methacholine PC20:5.1 mg/ml), progressed up until 24 hours, and returned to normal on the seventh day. This case provides evidence that the response of the airway to TDI may not always be accompanied by bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Screening programs utilizing methacholine challenges may not always identify TDI-sensitized asthmatic workers.
目前,哮喘常因支气管反应性正常而在诊断上被排除。我们报告一例TDI诱发的职业性哮喘患者,其支气管反应性正常。他在接触TDI期间及之后的几个月里一直呼吸急促。他最初的乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验显示为阴性反应。TDI支气管激发试验显示有孤立的即刻支气管收缩。随后的乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验显示,在TDI激发后7小时出现支气管高反应性(乙酰甲胆碱PC20:5.1mg/ml),持续发展至24小时,并在第7天恢复正常。该病例证明气道对TDI的反应可能并不总是伴有对乙酰甲胆碱的支气管高反应性。利用乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的筛查项目可能无法总是识别出对TDI致敏的哮喘工人。