Suppr超能文献

[基层医疗医生和护士基本生命支持与除颤技能的测试]

[Test to measure basic life support and defibrillation skills in primary care doctors and nurses].

作者信息

Casabella Abril Bartomeu, Lacasta Tintorer David, Clusa Gironella Thais, Perelló Bratescu Aina, García Ortega M A Dolores, Albiach Pla Antoni, Larrea Tárrega Salomé

机构信息

CAP Drassanes. Equipo de Atención Primaria Raval Sud (SAP Litoral-Institut Català de la Salut), Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prepare and validate a tool to measure Basic Life Support (BLS) and semi-automatic defibrillator (SAD) skills adapted for use by health professionals in Primary Care Teams (PCT). To propose an updated version and demonstrate self-sufficiency of the team to use it in a training evaluation.

DESIGN

Validation of measurement tools. Study of reliability with repeated measurements after a training course.

SETTING

Drassanes Primary Care Centre. Raval Sud Basic Health Area. Barcelona. Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 37 voluntary resuscitators (all doctors/nurses), professional camera, medical controller, computerised mannequin, 6 evaluators.

INTERVENTIONS

Test preparation methodology. Cardiff Model 3.1.

IMPLEMENTATION

2 filmed series (professional+domestic), of 26-25 "station type" simulations, separated by 1 month. A training workshop between series. Retrospective evaluation of DVD recordings (5 evaluators). 2nd series scored again at 3 weeks with a blind and random order filmed version.

VARIABLES

performances classified from worse to best execution. Psychometric analysis: Validity (content/apparent). Test-retest reliability, between-observer and sensitivity to change.

RESULTS

Compared to the Cardiff test (46 items) our 83 item test contained 38(46%) new, 34(41%) modified and 11(13%) similar. Between-evaluator reliability, excellent/good in 51/62 items analysed; Within-evaluator and between-filming reliability, excellent/good in all except 1 item; the test score doubled after the training course. A version of the test according to BLS-SAD recommendations is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

On there not being useful tools available for Primary Care doctors and nurses, one has been prepared with adequate psychometric guarantees and proven self-sufficient evaluation. We propose the immediate application of the updated version for training evaluation purposes.

摘要

目的

准备并验证一种用于测量基础生命支持(BLS)和半自动除颤器(SAD)技能的工具,使其适用于基层医疗团队(PCT)中的卫生专业人员使用。提出该工具的更新版本,并证明团队在培训评估中使用它的自给自足能力。

设计

测量工具的验证。培训课程后进行重复测量的可靠性研究。

地点

德拉萨内斯初级保健中心。巴塞罗那拉瓦尔南区基本卫生区。西班牙。

参与者

共有37名志愿复苏人员(均为医生/护士)、专业摄像机、医疗控制器、计算机模拟人、6名评估人员。

干预措施

测试准备方法。卡迪夫模型3.1。

实施

2个拍摄系列(专业版+家用版),包含26 - 25个“站式”模拟,间隔1个月。系列之间有一个培训工作坊。对DVD录像进行回顾性评估(5名评估人员)。在3周时对第二个系列再次进行评分,采用盲法和随机顺序拍摄版本。

变量

表现从最差到最佳执行进行分类。心理测量分析:效度(内容/表面)。重测信度、观察者间信度和对变化的敏感性。

结果

与卡迪夫测试(46项)相比,我们的83项测试包含38项(46%)新内容、34项(41%)修改内容和11项(13%)相似内容。在分析的62项中,评估人员间信度在51项中为优/良;评估人员内信度和拍摄间信度,除1项外均为优/良;培训课程后测试分数翻倍。提出了一个根据BLS - SAD建议的测试版本。

结论

由于没有适用于基层医疗医生和护士的有用工具,因此准备了一个具有充分心理测量保证且经证明具有自给自足评估能力的工具。我们建议立即应用更新版本用于培训评估目的。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Bias, prevalence and kappa.偏倚、患病率及kappa值
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验