• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[Test to measure basic life support and defibrillation skills in primary care doctors and nurses].[基层医疗医生和护士基本生命支持与除颤技能的测试]
Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
2
Reliability of the Cardiff Test of basic life support and automated external defibrillation version 3.1.加的夫基础生命支持与自动体外除颤测试第3.1版的可靠性
Resuscitation. 2003 Dec;59(3):291-314. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00246-6.
3
[Evaluation of a training model for health professionals in the care of critical patients: AIPCAP Study].[针对重症患者护理的卫生专业人员培训模式评估:AIPCAP研究]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Mar;52(3):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.08.009. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
Current state of knowledge of basic life support in health professionals of the largest city in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.巴基斯坦最大城市卫生专业人员基本生命支持知识现状:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4676-y.
5
Evaluation of staff's retention of ACLS and BLS skills.评估工作人员对高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)和基础生命支持(BLS)技能的保持情况。
Resuscitation. 2008 Jul;78(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
6
Analyses of inter-rater reliability between professionals, medical students and trained school children as assessors of basic life support skills.对专业人员、医学生和经过培训的学童作为基本生命支持技能评估者之间的评分者间信度进行分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Oct 7;16(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0788-9.
7
Nurses are more efficient than doctors in teaching basic life support and automated external defibrillator in nurses.在教授基础生命支持和自动体外除颤器方面,护士比医生更高效。
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Feb;29(2):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Developing Evidence-Based Practice questionnaire for community health nurses: reliability and validity of a Spanish adaptation.为社区健康护士编制循证实践问卷:西班牙语改编版的信效度研究
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Feb;25(3-4):505-17. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13078.
9
[First-year medical residents' self-assessment of skill in basic life support and automatic external defibrillation].[一年级住院医师对基本生命支持和自动体外除颤技能的自我评估]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010 Apr;57(4):201-8. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(10)70205-x.
10
Impact of simulation training on Jordanian nurses' performance of basic life support skills: A pilot study.模拟培训对约旦护士基本生命支持技能表现的影响:一项试点研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Sep;35(9):999-1003. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Simulated Clinical Stations in Quality and Patient Safety in a Primary Care Setting.基层医疗环境中质量与患者安全的模拟临床工作站
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 24;13(13):1501. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131501.
2
Construction and psychometric validation in Spanish schoolchildren of a knowledge questionnaire on basic life support and Automated External Defibrillator (ConocES-BLS/AED) in Spain.西班牙针对西班牙学童的基本生命支持和自动体外除颤器知识问卷(ConocES-BLS/AED)的构建及心理测量学验证。
Resusc Plus. 2024 Oct 4;20:100792. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100792. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
[Evaluation of a training model for health professionals in the care of critical patients: AIPCAP Study].[针对重症患者护理的卫生专业人员培训模式评估:AIPCAP研究]
Aten Primaria. 2020 Mar;52(3):151-158. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.08.009. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of the Cardiff Test of basic life support and automated external defibrillation version 3.1.加的夫基础生命支持与自动体外除颤测试第3.1版的可靠性
Resuscitation. 2003 Dec;59(3):291-314. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00246-6.
2
Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months, with a note on the value of re-training.基础生命支持教学方法试验(3):首次培训后及6个月时模拟心肺复苏表现的比较,并对再培训的价值加以说明
Resuscitation. 2002 May;53(2):179-87. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00025-4.
3
An automated voice advisory manikin system for training in basic life support without an instructor. A novel approach to CPR training.一种用于在没有教员的情况下进行基本生命支持培训的自动语音指导人体模型系统。一种心肺复苏术培训的新方法。
Resuscitation. 2001 Aug;50(2):167-72. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(01)00331-8.
4
Assessing with CARE: an innovative method of testing the approach and casualty assessment components of basic life support, using video recording.采用CARE进行评估:一种使用视频记录来测试基本生命支持的方法及伤员评估组成部分的创新方法。
Resuscitation. 1997 Feb;34(1):43-9. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01046-5.
5
Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills of general practitioners using different scoring methods.使用不同评分方法评估全科医生的心肺复苏技能。
Resuscitation. 1997 Feb;34(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(96)01028-3.
6
Bias, prevalence and kappa.偏倚、患病率及kappa值
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 May;46(5):423-9. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90018-v.

[基层医疗医生和护士基本生命支持与除颤技能的测试]

[Test to measure basic life support and defibrillation skills in primary care doctors and nurses].

作者信息

Casabella Abril Bartomeu, Lacasta Tintorer David, Clusa Gironella Thais, Perelló Bratescu Aina, García Ortega M A Dolores, Albiach Pla Antoni, Larrea Tárrega Salomé

机构信息

CAP Drassanes. Equipo de Atención Primaria Raval Sud (SAP Litoral-Institut Català de la Salut), Spain.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2010 Jan;42(1):7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.aprim.2009.03.006
PMID:19660840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7022135/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To prepare and validate a tool to measure Basic Life Support (BLS) and semi-automatic defibrillator (SAD) skills adapted for use by health professionals in Primary Care Teams (PCT). To propose an updated version and demonstrate self-sufficiency of the team to use it in a training evaluation.

DESIGN

Validation of measurement tools. Study of reliability with repeated measurements after a training course.

SETTING

Drassanes Primary Care Centre. Raval Sud Basic Health Area. Barcelona. Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 37 voluntary resuscitators (all doctors/nurses), professional camera, medical controller, computerised mannequin, 6 evaluators.

INTERVENTIONS

Test preparation methodology. Cardiff Model 3.1.

IMPLEMENTATION

2 filmed series (professional+domestic), of 26-25 "station type" simulations, separated by 1 month. A training workshop between series. Retrospective evaluation of DVD recordings (5 evaluators). 2nd series scored again at 3 weeks with a blind and random order filmed version.

VARIABLES

performances classified from worse to best execution. Psychometric analysis: Validity (content/apparent). Test-retest reliability, between-observer and sensitivity to change.

RESULTS

Compared to the Cardiff test (46 items) our 83 item test contained 38(46%) new, 34(41%) modified and 11(13%) similar. Between-evaluator reliability, excellent/good in 51/62 items analysed; Within-evaluator and between-filming reliability, excellent/good in all except 1 item; the test score doubled after the training course. A version of the test according to BLS-SAD recommendations is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

On there not being useful tools available for Primary Care doctors and nurses, one has been prepared with adequate psychometric guarantees and proven self-sufficient evaluation. We propose the immediate application of the updated version for training evaluation purposes.

摘要

目的

准备并验证一种用于测量基础生命支持(BLS)和半自动除颤器(SAD)技能的工具,使其适用于基层医疗团队(PCT)中的卫生专业人员使用。提出该工具的更新版本,并证明团队在培训评估中使用它的自给自足能力。

设计

测量工具的验证。培训课程后进行重复测量的可靠性研究。

地点

德拉萨内斯初级保健中心。巴塞罗那拉瓦尔南区基本卫生区。西班牙。

参与者

共有37名志愿复苏人员(均为医生/护士)、专业摄像机、医疗控制器、计算机模拟人、6名评估人员。

干预措施

测试准备方法。卡迪夫模型3.1。

实施

2个拍摄系列(专业版+家用版),包含26 - 25个“站式”模拟,间隔1个月。系列之间有一个培训工作坊。对DVD录像进行回顾性评估(5名评估人员)。在3周时对第二个系列再次进行评分,采用盲法和随机顺序拍摄版本。

变量

表现从最差到最佳执行进行分类。心理测量分析:效度(内容/表面)。重测信度、观察者间信度和对变化的敏感性。

结果

与卡迪夫测试(46项)相比,我们的83项测试包含38项(46%)新内容、34项(41%)修改内容和11项(13%)相似内容。在分析的62项中,评估人员间信度在51项中为优/良;评估人员内信度和拍摄间信度,除1项外均为优/良;培训课程后测试分数翻倍。提出了一个根据BLS - SAD建议的测试版本。

结论

由于没有适用于基层医疗医生和护士的有用工具,因此准备了一个具有充分心理测量保证且经证明具有自给自足评估能力的工具。我们建议立即应用更新版本用于培训评估目的。