• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用康复与恢复评估(CARE)对腹部和盆腔手术后患者报告的恢复情况:对衡量手术护理过程和创新的影响的意义。

Patient-reported recovery after abdominal and pelvic surgery using the Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE): implications for measuring the impact of surgical processes of care and innovation.

作者信息

Hedgepeth Ryan C, Wolf J Stuart, Dunn Rodney L, Wei John T, Hollenbeck Brent K

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105-2967, USA.

出版信息

Surg Innov. 2009 Sep;16(3):243-8. doi: 10.1177/1553350609342075. Epub 2009 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1177/1553350609342075
PMID:19661099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2891526/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recovery is an integral part of the surgical process and measuring it provides insight into the impact of surgical innovation. This study used a recently validated instrument, the Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE), to measure return to baseline health after surgery and explore clinical factors associated with recovery.

STUDY DESIGN

Patient health was measured among 96 patients before and after abdominal and pelvic surgery. Patients were grouped by time to recovery of 90% of baseline status. chi2 Tests and logistic models were used to measure relationships between recovery time and patient characteristics, processes of care, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Return to baseline health was reached by 44% of patients within 2 weeks, 28% between 2 and 4 weeks, and 28% after 4 weeks. Patients who recovered faster were younger, female, single, and undergoing ambulatory surgery for benign diseases. Patients who were married, underwent surgery for cancer, or had bowel surgery were more likely to require longer recovery time.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient and clinical characteristics were found to be associated with recovery after surgery. CARE appears to be sensitive to these factors and may be useful for informed decision making, assessing changes in processes of care, and evaluating the impact of surgical innovations on recovery.

摘要

背景

康复是手术过程的一个重要组成部分,对其进行测量有助于深入了解手术创新的影响。本研究使用了一种最近经过验证的工具——康复与恢复评估(CARE),来测量手术后恢复到基线健康状态的情况,并探索与康复相关的临床因素。

研究设计

对96例腹部和盆腔手术后的患者在术前和术后进行了健康状况测量。根据恢复到基线状态90%的时间对患者进行分组。采用卡方检验和逻辑模型来测量恢复时间与患者特征、护理过程及结果之间的关系。

结果

44%的患者在2周内恢复到基线健康状态,28%的患者在2至4周恢复,28%的患者在4周后恢复。恢复较快的患者年龄较小、为女性、单身,且因良性疾病接受门诊手术。已婚、接受癌症手术或进行肠道手术的患者更有可能需要更长的恢复时间。

结论

发现一些患者和临床特征与手术后的恢复相关。CARE似乎对这些因素敏感,可能有助于做出明智的决策、评估护理过程的变化以及评估手术创新对恢复的影响。

相似文献

1
Patient-reported recovery after abdominal and pelvic surgery using the Convalescence and Recovery Evaluation (CARE): implications for measuring the impact of surgical processes of care and innovation.使用康复与恢复评估(CARE)对腹部和盆腔手术后患者报告的恢复情况:对衡量手术护理过程和创新的影响的意义。
Surg Innov. 2009 Sep;16(3):243-8. doi: 10.1177/1553350609342075. Epub 2009 Aug 5.
2
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial.多学科护理方案对妇科手术后患者康复和重返工作的效果:一项随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Feb 1;12:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-29.
3
Measuring convalescence after laparoscopic surgery.测量腹腔镜手术后的康复情况。
Urology. 2007 Jun;69(6):1025-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.050.
4
Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.实施尿失禁特定的术后加速康复(ERAS)路径。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):495.e1-495.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
5
The impact of surgical complications on health-related quality of life in women undergoing gynecologic and gynecologic oncology procedures: a prospective longitudinal cohort study.手术并发症对接受妇科及妇科肿瘤手术的女性健康相关生活质量的影响:一项前瞻性纵向队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;215(4):457.e1-457.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
6
Recovery at home after major gynecologic surgery: how do our patients fare?妇科大手术后的家庭康复:我们的患者情况如何?
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):780-4. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824bb15e.
7
Understanding the Meaning of Recovery to Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery.理解接受腹部手术患者的康复含义。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):758-765. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1557.
8
Patient-Reported Convalescence and Quality of Life Recovery: A Comparison of Open and Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy.患者报告的康复情况及生活质量恢复:开放性与机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的比较
Surg Innov. 2016 Dec;23(6):598-605. doi: 10.1177/1553350616656284. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Restricted Convalescence Following Urogynecologic Procedures: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Study.限制妇科泌尿手术后的恢复期:一项随机对照研究的 1 年结果。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Feb 1;27(2):e336-e341. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000922.
10
How to Quantify Recovery After Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: An Assessment of Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life.如何量化腹腔镜肾上腺切除术后的恢复情况:对患者报告的健康相关生活质量的评估
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Aug;26(4):290-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000290.

引用本文的文献

1
The PSR13, a tool for evaluating patient-perceived recovery after vaginal prolapse repair surgery.PSR13,一种用于评估阴道脱垂修复手术后患者自我感觉恢复情况的工具。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Nov;33(11):3195-3202. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05372-6. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Validation of a German translation of the CARE questionnaire and its implementation as electronic PROM to assess patient-reported postoperative convalescence and recovery after major urological surgery.验证 CARE 问卷的德译版本,并将其作为电子 PROM 实施,以评估大泌尿外科手术后患者报告的术后康复和恢复情况。
World J Urol. 2021 Oct;39(10):3979-3991. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03713-6. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Korean version of the convalescence and recovery evaluation: translation and linguistic validation.恢复期及康复评估的韩文版本:翻译与语言验证。
Prostate Int. 2020 Dec;8(4):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 27.
4
Outcomes of minimally invasive partial nephrectomy among very elderly patients: report from the RESURGE collaborative international database.高龄患者行微创部分肾切除术的结局:来自RESURGE国际协作数据库的报告
Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(3):273-279. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0179. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
5
Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS).经阴道式全子宫及阴道顶端固定术:内镜手术策略比较(ACCESS)
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Sep;33(5):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.05.007. Epub 2012 May 27.
6
Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery.评估肾手术后患者报告的生活质量结果。
Urology. 2012 Jun;79(6):1268-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.047. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the convalescence and recovery evaluation (CARE) for measuring quality of life after surgery.用于评估术后生活质量的康复与恢复评估(CARE)的开发与验证
Qual Life Res. 2008 Aug;17(6):915-26. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9366-x. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
2
Activities of daily living and quality of life of elderly patients after elective surgery for gastric and colorectal cancers.老年胃癌和结直肠癌择期手术后的日常生活活动及生活质量
Ann Surg. 2007 Aug;246(2):222-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180caa3fb.
3
Patient-reported outcomes. How important are they?患者报告的结局。它们有多重要?
Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):503-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9255-3. Epub 2007 Mar 3.
4
A prospective evaluation of the short-term impact and recovery of health-related quality of life in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):72-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06533.x.
5
Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.质量、创新与性价比:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)与英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)
JAMA. 2005 Nov 23;294(20):2618-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.294.20.2618.
6
Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.腹股沟疝开放网片修补术与腹腔镜网片修补术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 29;350(18):1819-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040093. Epub 2004 Apr 25.
7
Predicting quality of life after radical prostatectomy: results from CaPSURE.预测根治性前列腺切除术后的生活质量:CaPSURE研究结果
J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):703-7; discussion 707-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000107964.61300.f6.
8
Increased spending on health care: how much can the United States afford?医疗保健支出增加:美国能负担多少?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Jul-Aug;22(4):15-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.22.4.15.
9
Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术与开放性结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的短期生活质量结果:一项随机试验
JAMA. 2002 Jan 16;287(3):321-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.3.321.
10
Life after radical prostatectomy: a longitudinal study.根治性前列腺切除术后的生活:一项纵向研究。
J Urol. 2001 Aug;166(2):587-92.