Burke Anna D, Tariot Pierre N
Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85006, USA.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;10(15):2407-14. doi: 10.1517/14656560903200659.
Recent emerging data regarding the safety and tolerability of atypical antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia have called into question common prescribing practices. Although the lifetime risk of developing significant psychopathology in dementia patients approaches nearly 100%, treatment options remain scant and controversial. Millions of people are suffering the consequences of these debilitating dementias. Yet the lack of regulatory approval or even recognition of the problem creates a dilemma for clinicians in practice who are trying to care for severely ill patients. There are data indicating that certain behavioral features can be treated successfully with atypical antipsychotics, offset by a high rate of adversity. This does not lead to the simple conclusion that they should never be used, since the alternatives are either fraught with the same shortcomings or actually lack evidence of benefit altogether. Further, it is not realistic to assume that nonpharmacological approaches, although preferred, will always carry the day. Since we do not have the evidence to define best practice for treating psychopathology, we are forced to make the most of the data we have and exercise best judgment about risk and benefit on a case-by-case basis.
近期有关非典型抗精神病药物在老年痴呆患者中的安全性和耐受性的新出现的数据,对常见的处方做法提出了质疑。尽管痴呆患者一生中出现显著精神病理学症状的风险接近100%,但治疗选择仍然匮乏且存在争议。数百万人正在承受这些使人衰弱的痴呆症的后果。然而,缺乏监管批准甚至对该问题的认识,给临床实践中试图照顾重症患者的医生带来了困境。有数据表明,某些行为特征可用非典型抗精神病药物成功治疗,但不良反应发生率较高。这并不会得出它们永远不应使用的简单结论,因为替代方案要么存在同样的缺点,要么实际上完全缺乏获益证据。此外,假设非药物方法尽管更可取,但总能奏效是不现实的。由于我们没有证据来界定治疗精神病理学的最佳做法,我们被迫充分利用现有的数据,并根据具体情况对风险和获益做出最佳判断。