Andréoletti Laurent, Lévêque Nicolas, Boulagnon Camille, Brasselet Camille, Fornes Paul
Laboratoire de virologie médicale et moléculaire, hôpital Robert-Debré, CHU de Reims, avenue du Général-Koenig, 51092 Reims cedex, France.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Jun-Jul;102(6-7):559-68. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
The diagnosis of acute myocarditis is complex and challenging. The use of the Dallas criteria in the diagnosis of myocarditis is associated with poor sensitivity and specificity because of the sampling error related to the often focal distribution of the specific histological lesions in cardiac tissue and the variability in pathological interpretation. To improve histological diagnosis, additional virological evaluation of cardiac tissues is required, with immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques allowing identification and quantification of viral infection markers. The diagnostic gold standard is endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) with the histological Dallas criteria, in association with new immunohistochemical and PCR analyses of cardiac tissues. Using real-time PCR and reverse transcription PCR assays, parvovirus B19, Coxsackie B virus, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) type B and adenovirus have been detected in 37, 33, 11 and 8% of EMB, respectively, from young adults (aged<35 years) with histologically proven acute myocarditis. Viral co-infections have also been found in 12% of acute myocarditis cases, generally parvovirus B19 plus HHV-6. Moreover, herpesviruses such as the Epstein-Barr virus or cytomegalovirus can also be associated with myocarditis after heart transplantation. During the clinical course of myocarditis, the immunohistochemical detection of enterovirus, adenovirus or parvovirus B19 capsid proteins or herpesvirus late proteins is necessary to differentiate a viral cardiac infection with replication activities from a persistent or latent cardiac infection. These new viral diagnostic approaches can lead to better identification of the aetiology of myocarditis and may therefore enable the development and evaluation of specific aetiology-directed treatment strategies.
急性心肌炎的诊断复杂且具有挑战性。由于与心脏组织中特定组织学病变通常呈局灶性分布相关的抽样误差以及病理解读的变异性,使用达拉斯标准诊断心肌炎时,其敏感性和特异性较差。为改善组织学诊断,需要对心脏组织进行额外的病毒学评估,免疫组织化学和聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术可用于识别和定量病毒感染标志物。诊断金标准是采用达拉斯组织学标准的心内膜心肌活检(EMB),并结合对心脏组织进行新的免疫组织化学和PCR分析。使用实时PCR和逆转录PCR检测,在组织学确诊为急性心肌炎的年轻成年人(年龄<35岁)的EMB中,分别有37%、33%、11%和8%检测到细小病毒B19、柯萨奇B病毒、人疱疹病毒6型(HHV - 6)B型和腺病毒。在12%的急性心肌炎病例中还发现了病毒合并感染,通常是细小病毒B19加HHV - 6。此外,诸如爱泼斯坦 - 巴尔病毒或巨细胞病毒等疱疹病毒在心脏移植后也可能与心肌炎有关。在心肌炎的临床过程中,免疫组织化学检测肠道病毒、腺病毒或细小病毒B19衣壳蛋白或疱疹病毒晚期蛋白对于区分具有复制活性的病毒性心脏感染与持续性或潜伏性心脏感染是必要的。这些新的病毒诊断方法可以更好地识别心肌炎的病因,因此可能有助于制定和评估针对特定病因的治疗策略。