羊膜腔穿刺术与标准注射器技术用于羊膜腔穿刺的比较：1219例经验
Amniovacucentesis vs standard syringe technique for amniocentesis: experience with 1219 cases.
作者信息
Calda Pavel, Brestak Miroslav
机构信息
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
出版信息
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec;201(6):593.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.06.023. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to compare amniovacucentesis to the usual syringe use for amniotic fluid aspiration.
STUDY DESIGN
We compared 2 groups of procedures: 1117 amniocenteses performed with the usual syringe technique and 1219 amniovacucenteses.
RESULTS
The numbers of needle insertions, unsuccessful amniocyte cultures, and miscarriage up to 21 days after the procedure were statistically not significant (P>.01) comparing the 2 techniques.
CONCLUSION
The vacuum tube serves as an automated aspiration tool alternative. The major subjective differences between the 2 methods are the operator's comfort and dexterity during sampling and the absence of an extra manipulation of the amniotic fluid after aspiration.
目的
本研究旨在比较羊膜腔穿刺术与常规使用注射器抽取羊水的方法。
研究设计
我们比较了两组操作：1117例采用常规注射器技术进行的羊膜腔穿刺术和1219例使用羊膜腔穿刺器进行的穿刺术。
结果
比较两种技术，穿刺针插入次数、羊水细胞培养失败数以及术后21天内的流产率在统计学上无显著差异（P>0.01）。
结论
真空管可作为一种自动抽吸工具的替代方法。两种方法之间主要的主观差异在于采样过程中操作者的舒适度和灵活性，以及抽吸后无需对羊水进行额外操作。
Zotero 插件