Suppr超能文献

一项评估经腹绒毛取样时两种不同抽吸技术的随机研究。

A randomized study to assess two different techniques of aspiration while performing transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.

作者信息

Battagliarin G, Lanna M, Coviello D, Tassis B, Quarenghi A, Nicolini U

机构信息

1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milano, Ospedale Buzzi, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;33(2):169-72. doi: 10.1002/uog.6216.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The technique used to perform transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) is not standardized, but aspiration of villi is generally obtained by discontinuous vacuum created in a syringe, manually or by a hand-grip device. We evaluated the feasibility of a new method of performing CVS which employs a 4-mL Vacutainer connected to the needle, producing a continuous negative pressure.

METHODS

Two hundred pregnant women, whose gestational age ranged from 10 + 2 to 16 + 2 (mean, 12 + 1) weeks, entered the randomized study, which was powered to detect with 90% probability the absence of any difference in the size of chorionic samples obtained by using a 20-mL syringe with the vacuum obtained by a hand-grip device (Group 1) or by a vacutainer (Group 2). Four operators with different levels of experience performed all the procedures, which were done transabdominally using a freehand technique with a 20-gauge needle under ultrasound guidance.

RESULTS

Maternal age, body mass index, gestational age and the way the needle was inserted within the chorion were similar in the two groups. The median amount of villi sampled was 20 mg, with no differences between the two groups. The rate of fetal loss was 1.7%. All losses occurred in women of Group 1 who had only one needle insertion. A second needle insertion was required more frequently while using the vacutainer.

CONCLUSION

This new technique for performing transabdominal CVS uses a readily available device and is as effective as traditional sampling systems to aspirate villi. It has the advantage of being a one-operator procedure.

摘要

目的

经腹绒毛取样(CVS)所采用的技术尚未标准化,但通常是通过手动或使用手持装置在注射器中产生间断性真空来获取绒毛。我们评估了一种新的CVS操作方法的可行性,该方法采用连接到针头的4毫升真空采血管,产生持续负压。

方法

200名孕周为10 + 2至16 + 2(平均12 + 1)周的孕妇进入随机研究,该研究旨在以90%的概率检测使用20毫升注射器并通过手持装置(第1组)或真空采血管(第2组)获得的绒毛样本大小是否存在差异。四名经验水平不同的操作人员完成了所有操作,这些操作是在超声引导下经腹徒手使用20号针头进行的。

结果

两组孕妇的年龄、体重指数、孕周以及针头插入绒毛膜的方式相似。取样绒毛的中位数为20毫克,两组之间无差异。胎儿丢失率为1.7%。所有丢失均发生在仅进行一次针头插入的第1组女性中。使用真空采血管时,需要更频繁地进行第二次针头插入。

结论

这种经腹CVS的新技术使用了一种现成的装置,在吸取绒毛方面与传统取样系统一样有效。它具有单人操作的优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验