Rubinstein Richard A, DeHaan Alex
Portland Knee Clinic, Portland, OR, United States.
Knee. 2010 Jan;17(1):29-32. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.07.001. Epub 2009 Aug 6.
This study investigates a cohort of patients who required a manipulation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to determine whether there was an association between pre-TKA and post-manipulation range of motion (ROM). Thirty-seven of 800 TKAs were manipulated (4.6% incidence); complete data were available for 36 knees. The pre-TKA stiff group (<110 degrees total arc of motion; n=16), on average, had 27 degrees less arc of motion before TKA than the non-stiff group (n=20; p<0.001). Mean arc of motion in the stiff group was 68 degrees before manipulation and 109 degrees after manipulation (p<0.001). Mean arc of motion in the non-stiff group was 80 degrees before manipulation and 118 degrees after manipulation (p<0.001). Patients with pre-TKA stiffness improved from a total arc of motion of 94 to 109 (p<0.001) while patients without pre-TKA stiffness changed from 121 to 118 (p=0.169). In both groups, the success of TKA can still be high despite early motion loss and subsequent manipulation.
本研究调查了一组全膝关节置换术(TKA)后需要进行手法治疗的患者,以确定TKA术前与手法治疗后活动范围(ROM)之间是否存在关联。800例TKA中有37例接受了手法治疗(发生率为4.6%);36个膝关节有完整数据。TKA术前僵硬组(总活动弧<110度;n=16),平均而言,TKA术前的活动弧比非僵硬组(n=20;p<0.001)少27度。僵硬组手法治疗前的平均活动弧为68度,手法治疗后为109度(p<0.001)。非僵硬组手法治疗前的平均活动弧为80度,手法治疗后为118度(p<0.001)。术前僵硬的患者总活动弧从94度改善到109度(p<0.001),而术前无僵硬的患者从121度变为118度(p=0.169)。在两组中,尽管早期活动丧失并随后进行了手法治疗,但TKA的成功率仍然可以很高。