Park Myung S, Martini Wenjun Z, Dubick Michael A, Salinas Jose, Butenas Saulius, Kheirabadi Bijan S, Pusateri Anthony E, Vos Jeffrey A, Guymon Charles H, Wolf Steven E, Mann Kenneth G, Holcomb John B
U S Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA.
J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):266-75; discussion 275-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ae6f1c.
To investigate the hemostatic status of critically ill, nonbleeding trauma patients. We hypothesized that a hypercoagulable state exists in patients early after severe injury and that the pattern of clotting and fibrinolysis are similar between burned and nonburn trauma patients.
Patients admitted to the surgical or burn intensive care unit within 24 hours after injury were enrolled. Blood samples were drawn on days 0 through 7. Laboratory tests included prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), levels of activated factor XI, D-dimer, protein C percent activity, antithrombin III percent activity, and thromboelastography (TEG).
Study subjects were enrolled from April 1, 2004, to May 31, 2005, and included nonburn trauma patients (n = 33), burned patients (n = 25), and healthy (control) subjects (n = 20). Despite aggressive thromboprophylaxis, three subjects (2 burned and 1 nonburn trauma patients [6%]) had pulmonary embolism during hospitalization. Compared with controls, all patients had prolonged PT and aPTT (p < 0.05). The rate of clot formation (alpha angle) and maximal clot strength were higher for patients compared with those of controls (p < 0.05), indicating a hypercoagulable state. Injured patients also had lower protein C and antithrombin III percent activities and higher fibrinogen levels (p < 0.05 for all). Activated factor XI was elevated in 38% of patients (control subjects had undetectable levels).
Thromboelastography analysis of whole blood showed that patients were in a hypercoagulable state; this was not detected by plasma PT or aPTT. The high incidence of pulmonary embolism indicated that our current prophylaxis regimen could be improved.
研究危重症非出血性创伤患者的止血状态。我们假设严重损伤后的患者早期存在高凝状态,且烧伤和非烧伤创伤患者的凝血和纤溶模式相似。
纳入受伤后24小时内入住外科或烧伤重症监护病房的患者。在第0至7天采集血样。实验室检查包括凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)、活化因子XI水平、D - 二聚体、蛋白C活性百分比、抗凝血酶III活性百分比和血栓弹力图(TEG)。
研究对象于2004年4月1日至2005年5月31日入组,包括非烧伤创伤患者(n = 33)、烧伤患者(n = 25)和健康(对照)受试者(n = 20)。尽管采取了积极的血栓预防措施,但仍有3名受试者(2名烧伤患者和1名非烧伤创伤患者[6%])在住院期间发生肺栓塞。与对照组相比,所有患者的PT和aPTT均延长(p < 0.05)。患者的凝血形成率(α角)和最大凝血强度高于对照组(p < 0.05),表明处于高凝状态。受伤患者的蛋白C和抗凝血酶III活性百分比也较低,纤维蛋白原水平较高(均p < 0.05)。38%的患者活化因子XI升高(对照受试者检测不到该水平)。
全血血栓弹力图分析显示患者处于高凝状态;血浆PT或aPTT未检测到这一情况。肺栓塞的高发生率表明我们目前的预防方案有待改进。