• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用户对巴西南部心理社会保健服务的满意度。

User satisfaction with psychosocial healthcare services, Southern Brazil.

机构信息

Departamento de Enfermagem, Faculdade de Enfermagem e Obstetrícia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, 96030-002 Pelotas, RS, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Aug;43 Suppl 1:29-35. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009000800006.

DOI:10.1590/s0034-89102009000800006
PMID:19669062
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate user satisfaction with psychosocial healthcare services.

METHODS

Qualitative and quantitative study conducted in psychosocial healthcare services in the states of Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil, in 2006. The study combined quantitative and qualitative methods. Quantitative epidemiological data from a cross-sectional study including 1,162 users of 30 psychosocial healthcare services was used. The instrument used to evaluate users' satisfaction was the Brazilian version of the WHO Users' Satisfaction Scale (SATIS-BR), a 1 to 5-point scale. Qualitative data was collected from five case studies using a fourth generation approach. Information was obtained from field observations and interviews (between ten and 13 users in each field, totaling 57 users) and presented to users in validation and negotiation workshops.

RESULTS

The SATIS-BR scale showed that users positively evaluated all items, overall mean 4.4 (SD=0.4). Communication and relationship with psychosocial healthcare services staff had mean 4.5 (SD=0.5), and access to information through staff had mean 4.8. Satisfaction with care service was the lowest, mean 4.1, and general service infrastructure had mean 3.9. The qualitative study revealed that, according to users, the quality of treatment provided was good and the outcome was satisfactory. Their new status, better access to services, ending of their physical and social isolation, response to their demands and helping them reorganize their lives - all contributed to users' satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The complementary results of both study approaches showed that users are satisfied with care provided at the psychosocial healthcare services studied.

摘要

目的

评估使用者对心理社会保健服务的满意度。

方法

2006 年在巴西南里奥格兰德州、圣卡塔琳娜州和巴拉那州的心理社会保健服务中进行了定性和定量研究。该研究结合了定量和定性方法。使用了横断面研究的定量流行病学数据,该研究包括来自 30 个心理社会保健服务的 1162 名使用者。用于评估使用者满意度的工具是世界卫生组织使用者满意度量表(SATIS-BR)的巴西版本,这是一个 1 到 5 分的量表。定性数据是通过第四代方法从五个案例研究中收集的。信息是从现场观察和访谈中获得的(每个现场 10-13 名用户,总计 57 名用户),并在验证和协商工作坊中呈现给用户。

结果

SATIS-BR 量表显示,使用者对所有项目的评价均为正面,总体平均值为 4.4(SD=0.4)。与心理社会保健服务人员的沟通和关系得分为 4.5(SD=0.5),通过工作人员获取信息的满意度得分为 4.8。护理服务满意度最低,平均得分为 4.1,一般服务基础设施平均得分为 3.9。定性研究表明,根据使用者的说法,提供的治疗质量良好,结果令人满意。他们的新状态、更好地获得服务、结束身体和社会隔离、对他们的需求做出反应以及帮助他们重新组织生活,所有这些都有助于使用者的满意度。

结论

两种研究方法的补充结果表明,使用者对所研究的心理社会保健服务提供的护理感到满意。

相似文献

1
User satisfaction with psychosocial healthcare services, Southern Brazil.用户对巴西南部心理社会保健服务的满意度。
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Aug;43 Suppl 1:29-35. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009000800006.
2
Satisfaction of users of Psychosocial Care Centers.心理社会关怀中心使用者的满意度。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Dec 5;27:e3223. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3037.3223. eCollection 2019.
3
Levels of service user satisfaction in secure settings--a survey of the association between perceived social climate, perceived therapeutic relationship and satisfaction with forensic services.安全环境下服务使用者满意度水平——感知社会氛围、感知治疗关系与对法医服务满意度之间关系的调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2011 Nov;48(11):1349-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.05.011.
4
Brazilian Mental Health Services Assessment: user satisfaction and associated factors.巴西心理健康服务评估:用户满意度及相关因素
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Nov;23(11):3799-3810. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320182311.25722016.
5
Exploring the nonlinear impact of critical incidents on users' satisfaction with healthcare services.探究关键事件对用户医疗服务满意度的非线性影响。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Apr 15;32(3):621-634. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2018-0089.
6
[Evaluation of users' satisfaction regarding mental health care in the Family Health Strategy].
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011 Oct;45(5):1150-6. doi: 10.1590/s0080-62342011000500017.
7
Satisfaction with care in a Brazilian psychiatric inpatient unit: differences in perceptions among patients according to type of health insurance.巴西一家精神病住院单元的护理满意度:不同医疗保险类型患者的认知差异。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019 Jan-Mar;41(1):27-35. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0156. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
8
[Evaluation of a psychosocial care center: the view of the family].[对一个社会心理关怀中心的评估:家庭视角]
Cien Saude Colet. 2011 Nov;16(11):4405-14. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011001200013.
9
Satisfaction and burden of mental health personnel: data from healthcare services for substance users and their families.心理健康专业人员的满意度和负担:来自物质使用患者及其家属的医疗保健服务数据。
Braz J Psychiatry. 2018 Oct-Dec;40(4):403-409. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2352. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
10
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of a pilot community-based psychosocial intervention for patients with psychoses in Chile and Brazil: a comparative analysis of users' perspectives.在智利和巴西为精神病患者实施基于社区的心理社会干预试点:用户视角的比较分析
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2021 Apr 27;8:e15. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2021.10. eCollection 2021.
2
Satisfaction of users of Psychosocial Care Centers.心理社会关怀中心使用者的满意度。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Dec 5;27:e3223. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3037.3223. eCollection 2019.
3
Portuguese version of the EUROPEP questionnaire: contributions to the psychometric validation.
欧洲患者满意度调查问卷(EUROPEP)的葡萄牙语版本:对其心理测量学验证的贡献。
Rev Saude Publica. 2016 Oct 3;50(0):61. doi: 10.1590/S1518-8787.2016050006259.