Tontini Gerson, Vaz Elaine, Neto Evelásio Vieira, de Souza Julio Cesar Lopes, da Silva Leonardo Anésio, Nowazick Mara Paz Maurício
Department of Business Management, Universidade Regional de Blumenau - FURB , Blumenau, Brazil.
Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina - UNOESC , Chapecó, Brazil.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Apr 15;32(3):621-634. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2018-0089.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the nonlinear impact of users' memories on their general evaluation of outpatient healthcare services by the integration of two methodologies: critical incidents technique (CIT) and penalty-reward contrast analysis (PRCA).
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The authors carried out a survey with 356 respondents, users of seven outpatient clinics located in the city of Blumenau/SC, Brazil, during 2016. The participants were asked about their perceptions of positive and negative aspects of the service; and, using CIT, the answers were categorized according to the following dimensions: empathy, communication, facilities, access, promptness, medicines availability, complementary services, safety/confidentiality and service performance. Then, the authors evaluated the nonlinear impact of critical incidents on users' general evaluation of the service using the identified incidents as input variables in a PRCA.
The findings show that users of healthcare services tend to remember emotion and health aspects positively, while technical and formal aspects tend to be more negatively than positively remembered. On the other hand, PRCA identifies that incidents of three dimensions positively influence the overall perception of the service (empathy, complementary services and privacy) and five negatively (empathy, facilities, speed, drugs/pharmacy and health performance), explaining 26.3 percent of the variation in clients' general satisfaction.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The present paper explores the integration of two methodologies, showing how we can use open listening to healthcare service users to identify the nonlinear impact of different incidents on their general evaluation of the service. The results show that what customers remember does not necessarily influence overall customer satisfaction. The present approach allows companies to improve the process of listening to customers. There are no other papers exploring this approach, particularly in relation to healthcare services.
本文旨在通过整合关键事件技术(CIT)和奖惩对比分析(PRCA)这两种方法,评估用户记忆对其门诊医疗服务总体评价的非线性影响。
设计/方法/途径:作者于2016年对巴西布卢梅瑙市/圣卡塔琳娜州七家门诊诊所的356名用户进行了调查。参与者被问及他们对服务的积极和消极方面的看法;然后,使用关键事件技术,根据以下维度对答案进行分类:同理心、沟通、设施、就医便利性、及时性、药品供应、辅助服务、安全/保密性和服务表现。接着,作者将识别出的事件作为PRCA中的输入变量,评估关键事件对用户服务总体评价的非线性影响。
研究结果表明,医疗服务用户倾向于对情感和健康方面有积极的记忆,而技术和形式方面则往往是负面记忆多于正面记忆。另一方面,PRCA识别出三个维度的事件对服务的总体感知有积极影响(同理心、辅助服务和隐私),五个维度有负面影响(同理心、设施、速度、药品/药房和健康表现),解释了客户总体满意度变化的26.3%。
原创性/价值:本文探讨了两种方法的整合,展示了如何通过开放倾听医疗服务用户的意见来识别不同事件对其服务总体评价的非线性影响。结果表明,客户记住的内容不一定会影响总体客户满意度。目前的方法使公司能够改进倾听客户意见的过程。没有其他论文探讨这种方法,特别是在医疗服务方面。