Suppr超能文献

心理社会关怀中心使用者的满意度。

Satisfaction of users of Psychosocial Care Centers.

作者信息

Soares Fabiana Cruz, Flório Flávia Martão, Zanin Luciane

机构信息

Universidade Uninassau, Uninassau, Parnaíba, PI, Brazil.

Faculdade de Odontologia da São Leopoldo Mandic, São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brzsil.

出版信息

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Dec 5;27:e3223. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3037.3223. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

evaluate the satisfaction of users with the care provided at the Psychosocial Care Centers and its association with clinical and sociodemographic factors.

METHOD

this cross-sectional study was conducted with 55 users from 5 Psychosocial Care Centers. The sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were obtained through an individual structured interview. The abbreviated version of the Mental Health Services Satisfaction Scale (SATIS-BR) was used for data collection.

RESULTS

were descriptively analyzed and simple and multiple logistic regression models were adjusted for analysis of associations, estimating the gross and adjusted odds ratio, with the respective confidence intervals of 95%. Results: the age average of the sample was 40.1 (±12.4) years and the degree of satisfaction average was 4.56 (±0.45). Users with less education (primary school) had 5 times more chance of having less satisfaction (p<0.05). Users with frequency of intensive monitoring were 5 times more likely to have less satisfaction than users who receive monthly monitoring (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

the majority of users are satisfied with the service and factors such as low education and higher frequency of monitoring influenced the satisfaction.

摘要

目的

评估心理社会关怀中心提供的护理服务的用户满意度及其与临床和社会人口学因素的关联。

方法

本横断面研究对来自5个心理社会关怀中心的55名用户进行。通过个体结构化访谈获取社会人口学和临床特征。使用心理健康服务满意度量表(SATIS-BR)的简化版进行数据收集。

结果

进行描述性分析,并调整简单和多元逻辑回归模型以分析关联,估计粗比值比和调整后的比值比,以及各自95%的置信区间。结果:样本的平均年龄为40.1(±12.4)岁,平均满意度为4.56(±0.45)。受教育程度较低(小学)的用户满意度较低的可能性高出5倍(p<0.05)。接受密集监测的用户满意度低于每月接受监测的用户的可能性高出5倍(p<0.05)。

结论

大多数用户对服务感到满意,低教育程度和较高监测频率等因素影响了满意度。

相似文献

1
Satisfaction of users of Psychosocial Care Centers.心理社会关怀中心使用者的满意度。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Dec 5;27:e3223. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3037.3223. eCollection 2019.
6
[Factors associated with perception of improvement by users of Centers for Psychosocial Care in the South of Brazil].
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Aug 7;33(7):e00085216. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00085216.
10
Evaluation of family caregiver satisfaction with a mental health inpatient service.评估家庭照顾者对精神科住院服务的满意度。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2018 Oct-Dec;40(4):300-309. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0137. Epub 2018 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction in a State Reference Center of Bipolar Disorder.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;46(2):319-329. doi: 10.1007/s11414-017-9561-z.
5
[Policies and practices in mental health: the evidence in question].
Cien Saude Colet. 2013 Oct;18(10):2797-805. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232013001000002.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验