Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Hosp Med. 2009 Jul;4(6):350-5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.503.
Early goal-directed therapy for severe sepsis or septic shock improves outcomes but requires placement of a central venous catheter to measure central venous pressure (CVP), which may delay timely resuscitation and cause catheter-related complications. In addition, nonintensivists may not start early aggressive fluid resuscitation because of difficulty estimating CVP and concerns for inadvertent volume overload.
To determine if the CVP target of 8 to 12 mm Hg can be accurately assessed using noninvasive ultrasound to measure the internal jugular vein aspect ratio (height/width).
Prospective observational study.
Two academic medical centers.
Nineteen euvolemic volunteers and a convenience sample of 44 spontaneously breathing, critically ill patients.
Ultrasound imaging of internal jugular vein aspect ratio; invasive CVP measurement in critically ill patients.
For the volunteers, mean (standard deviation [SD]) aspect ratio of both the right and left internal jugular vein was 0.82 (0.07). Bland-Altman analysis indicated moderate intraobserver and interobserver agreement. Aspect ratio was similar for right and left sides and between men and women. In the critically ill patients, ultrasound accurately estimated a CVP of 8 mm Hg; area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.84. For an invasively measured CVP of <8 mm Hg, the likelihood ratio for a positive ultrasound test (aspect ratio <0.83) was 3.5 and for a negative test (aspect ratio > or =0.83) was 0.30.
In this exploratory study, noninvasive ultrasound imaging of internal jugular vein aspect ratio accurately estimated a CVP of 8 mm Hg in spontaneously breathing, critically ill patients.
严重脓毒症或感染性休克的早期目标导向治疗可改善预后,但需要放置中心静脉导管来测量中心静脉压(CVP),这可能会延迟及时复苏并导致导管相关并发症。此外,由于难以估计 CVP 以及担心无意中发生容量超负荷,非重症医学科医生可能不会开始早期积极的液体复苏。
确定使用非侵入性超声测量颈内静脉切面比(高度/宽度)是否可以准确评估 8 至 12 mmHg 的 CVP 目标。
前瞻性观察性研究。
两个学术医疗中心。
19 名血容量正常的志愿者和 44 名自主呼吸的重症患者的方便样本。
颈内静脉切面比的超声成像;重症患者的有创 CVP 测量。
对于志愿者,右颈内静脉和左颈内静脉的平均(标准差 [SD])切面比均为 0.82(0.07)。Bland-Altman 分析表明观察者内和观察者间具有中度一致性。右颈内静脉和左颈内静脉以及男女之间的切面比相似。在重症患者中,超声准确地估计了 8 mmHg 的 CVP;受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.84。对于测量的 CVP <8 mmHg 的患者,阳性超声检查(切面比 <0.83)的似然比为 3.5,阴性检查(切面比 >或=0.83)的似然比为 0.30。
在这项探索性研究中,颈内静脉切面比的非侵入性超声成像在自主呼吸的重症患者中准确地估计了 8 mmHg 的 CVP。