• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

指导式护理与复杂医疗保健的成本:初步报告。

Guided care and the cost of complex healthcare: a preliminary report.

作者信息

Leff Bruce, Reider Lisa, Frick Kevin D, Scharfstein Daniel O, Boyd Cynthia M, Frey Katherine, Karm Lya, Boult Chad

机构信息

School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2009 Aug;15(8):555-9.

PMID:19670959
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Guided Care (GC) is a model of proactive, evidence-based comprehensive healthcare provided by physician-nurse teams for people with several chronic health conditions. Our objective was to evaluate the preliminary effects of GC on health service utilization and costs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cluster-randomized controlled trial of GC involving 14 primary care teams (49 physicians) and 904 of their chronically ill patients age 65 years or older.

METHODS

Using insurance claims, we compared the health services used by patients who received GC with the health services used by patients who received usual care during the first 8 months of the study.

RESULTS

After adjustment for baseline characteristics, GC patients experienced, on average, 24% fewer hospital days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49% fewer, 13% more), 37% fewer skilled nursing facility days (95% CI: 65% fewer, 5% more), 15% fewer emergency department visits (95% CI: 38% fewer, 18% more), and 29% fewer home healthcare episodes (95% CI: 53% fewer, 8% more), as well as 9% more specialist visits (95% CI: 8% fewer, 29% more). Based on current Medicare payment rates and GC costs, these differences in utilization represent an annual net savings of $75,000 (95% CI: -$244,000, $150,900) per nurse, or $1364 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial introduction of GC into primary care practices may be associated with less use of expensive health services and a net savings in healthcare costs among older patients with several chronic health conditions. Final results from the remaining 2 years of this ongoing study will be published in 2011.

摘要

目的

引导式护理(GC)是一种由医生-护士团队为患有多种慢性健康问题的人群提供的主动式、循证综合医疗保健模式。我们的目的是评估GC对医疗服务利用和成本的初步影响。

研究设计

GC的整群随机对照试验,涉及14个初级保健团队(49名医生)及其904名65岁及以上的慢性病患者。

方法

利用保险理赔数据,我们比较了接受GC的患者与在研究的前8个月接受常规护理的患者所使用的医疗服务。

结果

在对基线特征进行调整后,GC组患者平均住院天数减少24%(95%置信区间[CI]:减少49%,增加13%),熟练护理设施使用天数减少37%(95%CI:减少65%,增加5%),急诊就诊次数减少15%(95%CI:减少38%,增加18%),家庭医疗护理次数减少29%(95%CI:减少53%,增加8%),专科就诊次数增加9%(95%CI:减少8%,增加29%)。根据当前医疗保险支付率和GC成本,这些利用差异意味着每名护士每年净节省75,000美元(95%CI:-244,000美元,150,900美元),或每名患者节省1364美元。

结论

将GC初步引入初级保健实践可能与老年慢性病患者减少使用昂贵医疗服务以及医疗保健成本净节省有关。这项正在进行的研究剩余2年的最终结果将于2011年发表。

相似文献

1
Guided care and the cost of complex healthcare: a preliminary report.指导式护理与复杂医疗保健的成本:初步报告。
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Aug;15(8):555-9.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of integrated care for people with HIV, chronic mental illness and substance abuse disorders.针对感染艾滋病毒、患有慢性精神疾病和药物滥用障碍患者的综合护理成本效益分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2009 Mar;12(1):33-46.
3
Reducing emergency visits in older adults with chronic illness. A randomized, controlled trial of group visits.减少慢性病老年人的急诊就诊次数。一项关于小组就诊的随机对照试验。
Eff Clin Pract. 2001 Mar-Apr;4(2):49-57.
4
Managed care and the delivery of primary care to the elderly and the chronically ill.管理式医疗与为老年人和慢性病患者提供初级保健服务
Health Serv Res. 1998 Jun;33(2 Pt Ii):322-53.
5
Effectiveness of a group outpatient visit model for chronically ill older health maintenance organization members: a 2-year randomized trial of the cooperative health care clinic.团体门诊模式对患有慢性病的老年健康维护组织成员的有效性:合作医疗诊所的一项为期两年的随机试验。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Sep;52(9):1463-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52408.x.
6
Health care utilization by old-old long-term care facility residents: how do Medicare fee-for-service and capitation rates compare?高龄长期护理机构居民的医疗保健利用情况:医疗保险按服务收费制和人头费率如何比较?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Oct;48(10):1330-6.
7
Reduced utilization and cost of primary care clinic visits resulting from self-care education for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.针对膝骨关节炎患者的自我护理教育降低了初级保健门诊就诊的利用率和成本。
Arthritis Rheum. 1999 Jun;42(6):1267-73. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1267::AID-ANR25>3.0.CO;2-E.
8
Does supplementary prenatal nursing and home visitation reduce healthcare costs in the year after childbirth?产前补充护理和家庭访视能否降低产后一年的医疗成本?
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Dec;56(6):657-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04036.x.
9
Better continuity of care reduces costs for diabetic patients.更好的医疗护理连续性可降低糖尿病患者的成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun;17(6):420-7.
10
Functional status and use of health care services: longitudinal study on the older adult population in Spain.功能状态与医疗服务利用:西班牙老年人口的纵向研究
Maturitas. 2007 Dec 20;58(4):377-86. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.09.008. Epub 2007 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Interprofessional collaboration in primary care: what effect on patient health? A systematic literature review.初级保健中的跨专业合作:对患者健康有何影响?系统文献回顾。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 29;24(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02189-0.
2
Information and Communication Technology Based Integrated Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review.基于信息通信技术的老年人综合照护:一项范围综述
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Apr 3;23(2):2. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6979. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
3
A mixed-methods systematic review of nurse-led interventions for people with multimorbidity.
多病症患者的护士主导干预措施的混合方法系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Dec;78(12):3930-3951. doi: 10.1111/jan.15427. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
4
Consider expenditure controls' impacts on equity.考虑支出控制对公平性的影响。
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May 29;36:100913. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100913. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
A randomized trial examining the effect of predictive analytics and tailored interventions on the cost of care.一项检验预测分析和个性化干预对医疗成本影响的随机试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Jun 3;4(1):92. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00449-w.
6
Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings.在初级保健和社区环境中改善多种疾病患者结局的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 15;1(1):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub4.
7
Typology of organizational innovation components: building blocks to improve access to primary healthcare for vulnerable populations.组织创新组件的类型学:改善弱势群体获得基本医疗服务的途径。
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 6;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01263-8.
8
Caring for the caregiver: a systematic review characterising the experience of caregivers of older adults with advanced cancers.照顾者关怀:一项系统评价,描述了照顾晚期癌症老年患者的照顾者的体验。
ESMO Open. 2020 Sep;5(5):e000862. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000862.
9
Organizational interventions improving access to community-based primary health care for vulnerable populations: a scoping review.改善弱势群体获得社区初级卫生保健机会的组织干预措施:一项范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 10;15(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0459-9.
10
Establishing a pragmatic framework to optimise health outcomes in heart failure and multimorbidity (ARISE-HF): A multidisciplinary position statement.建立一个优化心力衰竭和多种疾病健康结局的实用框架(ARISE-HF):一份多学科立场声明。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;212:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 10.