Center for Ethics, Emory University, GA, USA.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009 Dec;3 Suppl 2:S185-92. doi: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e3181ac194f.
Because of the importance of including ethical considerations in planning efforts for pandemic influenza, in February 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention requested that the Ethics Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee to the Director develop guidance that would serve as a foundation for decision making in preparing for and responding to pandemic influenza. Specifically, the ethics subcommittee was asked to make recommendations regarding ethical considerations relevant to decision making about vaccine and antiviral drug distribution prioritization and development of interventions that would limit individual freedom and create social distancing. The ethics subcommittee identified a number of general ethical considerations including identification of clear goals for pandemic planning, responsibility to maximize preparedness, transparency and public engagement, sound science, commitment to the global community, balancing individual liberty and community interests, diversity in ethical decision making, and commitment to justice. These general ethical considerations are applied to the issues of vaccine and antiviral drug distribution and use of community mitigation interventions.
由于在规划大流行性流感应对工作中纳入伦理考虑因素非常重要,2005 年 2 月,疾病预防控制中心要求主任顾问委员会伦理小组委员会制定指导意见,为大流行性流感的防范和应对工作中的决策提供依据。具体而言,要求伦理小组委员会就与疫苗和抗病毒药物分配的优先排序决策以及限制个人自由和实施社会隔离的干预措施的制定相关的伦理考虑因素提出建议。伦理小组委员会确定了一些一般的伦理考虑因素,包括为大流行规划确定明确的目标、对最大限度地做好准备负责、透明度和公众参与、合理的科学依据、对全球社会的承诺、平衡个人自由和社区利益、在伦理决策方面的多样性,以及对公正的承诺。这些一般的伦理考虑因素适用于疫苗和抗病毒药物的分配以及使用社区缓解干预措施的问题。