Gebbers Jan-Olaf
Institute of Environmental Medicine, Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
Ger Med Sci. 2007 Aug 16;5:Doc04.
Atherosclerosis, which causes approximately half of all deaths of adults over age 60 in industrialized nations, is a pandemic among inappropriately nourished and/or physically hypoactive children, adolescents, and adults world wide. Although nowadays statins are widely prescribed to middle age and elderly adults with high blood lipid levels as pharmacological prevention for the late complications of atherosclerosis, from a critical point of view statins seem not to solve the problem, especially when compared with certain natural ingredients of our nutrition like micronutrients as alternative strategy. Statin ingestion is associated with lowering of serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein concentrations; some prospective studies have shown statistical associations with subsequent modest reduction of mortality from cardiovascular disease. However, specific biochemical pathways and pharmacological roles of statins in prevention of atherosclerosis, if any, are unknown. Moreover, there have been no systematic cost-benefit analyses of life-style prophylaxis versus statin prophylaxis versus combined life-style plus statin prophylaxis versus neither life-style nor statin prophylaxis for clinically significant complications of cardiovascular diseases in the elderly. Further, in the trials of effectiveness statins were not compared with management of nutrition, which is the most appropriate alternative intervention. Such studies seem to be important, as the ever increasing world population, especially in developing countries, now demand expensive statins, which may be unaffordable for mitigating the pandemic. Studies of this kind are necessary to identify more precisely those patients for whom cardiovascular benefits will outweigh the risks and costs of the statin treatment in comparison with nutritional interventions. Against the background of the current pathogenetic concept of atherogenesis some of its possible risk factors, particularly the roles of cholesterol and homocysteine, and the effects of statins versus nutritional (micronutrients) interventions in prevention and treatment of the disease are discussed. The prevailing opinion that serum cholesterol as a mediator of the disease is increased by eating saturated fats and decreased by eating polyunsaturated fats is being challenged. Evidently, the beneficial effects of statins in atherosclerosis are not mainly due to its cholesterol lowering effect, rather than to its "pleiotropic effects". Other pathogenetic factors in atherosclerosis are involved, like inflammatory and immunologic processes, that can be modulated by statins as well as by other drugs or by the Mediterranean-style nutrition and by micronutrients (folate, B-vitamins).
动脉粥样硬化导致工业化国家60岁以上成年人约一半的死亡,在全球营养摄入不当和/或身体活动不足的儿童、青少年及成年人中呈流行态势。尽管如今他汀类药物被广泛开给血脂水平高的中年及老年成年人,作为动脉粥样硬化晚期并发症的药理学预防措施,但从关键角度看,他汀类药物似乎并未解决问题,尤其是与我们饮食中的某些天然成分(如微量营养素)作为替代策略相比时。服用他汀类药物与血清胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白浓度降低有关;一些前瞻性研究显示与随后心血管疾病死亡率适度降低存在统计学关联。然而,他汀类药物在预防动脉粥样硬化中的具体生化途径和药理学作用(若有的话)尚不清楚。此外,对于老年人心血管疾病临床显著并发症,尚未有关于生活方式预防、他汀类药物预防、生活方式加他汀类药物联合预防以及既无生活方式预防也无他汀类药物预防的系统成本效益分析。此外,在有效性试验中,他汀类药物未与营养管理进行比较,而营养管理是最合适的替代干预措施。这类研究似乎很重要,因为世界人口不断增加,尤其是在发展中国家,现在对昂贵的他汀类药物有需求,而减轻这种流行病负担可能无力承担这些药物费用。这类研究对于更精确地确定那些与营养干预相比,心血管益处将超过他汀类药物治疗风险和成本的患者是必要的。在当前动脉粥样硬化发病机制概念的背景下,讨论了其一些可能的风险因素,特别是胆固醇和同型半胱氨酸的作用,以及他汀类药物与营养(微量营养素)干预在疾病预防和治疗中的效果。认为血清胆固醇作为疾病介质会因食用饱和脂肪而升高、因食用多不饱和脂肪而降低这一普遍观点正受到挑战。显然,他汀类药物在动脉粥样硬化中的有益作用并非主要因其降低胆固醇的作用,而是因其“多效性作用”。动脉粥样硬化中还涉及其他发病因素,如炎症和免疫过程,这些可通过他汀类药物以及其他药物或地中海式饮食和微量营养素(叶酸、B族维生素)进行调节。