Fróes-Salgado N R G, Pfeifer C S C, Francci C E, Kawano Y
Department of Biomaterials and Oral Biochemistry, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2009 Jul-Aug;34(4):408-14. doi: 10.2341/08-104.
To evaluate the effect of light guide distance and the different photoactivation methods on the degree of conversion (DC) and microleakage of a composite.
Three photoactivation protocols (600 mW/cm2 x 40 seconds; 400 mW/cm2 x 60 seconds or 200 mW/cm2 x 20 seconds, followed by 500 mW/cm2 x 40 seconds) and three distances from the light source (0, 3 or 7 mm) were tested. Cylindrical specimens (5 mm diameter; 2 mm tall; n=3) were prepared for the DC test (FT-Raman). Class V cavities were made in 90 bovine incisors to conduct the microleakage test. The specimens were conditioned for 15 seconds with phosphoric acid (37%), followed by application of the adhesive system Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply/Caulk). The preparations were restored in bulk. The specimens were stored for 24 hours in distilled water (37 degrees C) before being submitted to the silver-nitrate microleakage protocol. The restorations were sectioned and analyzed under 25x magnification.
Statistical analyses (two-way ANOVAs and Tukey test, alpha=0.05) found significance only for the factor distance (p=0.015) at the top of the composite for the DC test. Conversion was statistically lower for the 7 mm groups compared to the 0 and 3 mm groups, which were equivalent to each other. At the bottom of the specimens, none of the factors or interactions was significant (p<0.05). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed that, in general, the soft-start method led to lower microleakage scores when compared to the continuous modes, mainly when associated with a distancing of 7 mm (p<0.01). With the exception of specimens irradiated with 400 mW/cm2 that did not demonstrate variations on scores for the distances tested, higher microleakage was observed for shorter distances from the light source.
Soft-start methods may reduce microleakage when the light guide distancing provides a low level of irradiance, which also causes a discrete reduction in the DC.
评估光导距离和不同光激活方法对复合材料转化率(DC)和微渗漏的影响。
测试了三种光激活方案(600 mW/cm²×40秒;400 mW/cm²×60秒或200 mW/cm²×20秒,随后500 mW/cm²×40秒)以及距光源的三个距离(0、3或7毫米)。制备圆柱形试样(直径5毫米;高2毫米;n = 3)用于DC测试(傅里叶变换拉曼光谱法)。在90颗牛切牙上制备V类洞以进行微渗漏测试。用磷酸(37%)对试样预处理15秒,随后应用Prime & Bond NT粘结系统(登士柏/卡克)。用复合材料整体修复制备洞型。在进行硝酸银微渗漏检测之前,将试样在蒸馏水(37℃)中储存24小时。将修复体切片并在25倍放大倍数下进行分析。
统计分析(双向方差分析和Tukey检验,α = 0.05)发现,在DC测试中,仅复合材料顶部的距离因素具有显著性(p = 0.015)。与0毫米和3毫米组(二者相当)相比,7毫米组的转化率在统计学上较低。在试样底部,各因素或交互作用均无显著性(p < 0.05)。Kruskal-Wallis检验表明,总体而言,与连续模式相比,软启动方法导致的微渗漏评分较低,主要是在距离为7毫米时(p < 0.01)。除了用400 mW/cm²照射的试样在测试距离上的评分未显示出差异外,光源距离越短,微渗漏越高。
当光导距离导致低水平辐照度时,软启动方法可能会减少微渗漏,这也会使DC略有降低。